GET THE APP

Restoring Resilience: Ecosystems, Climate, and Society
Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species

Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species

ISSN: 2332-2543

Open Access

Opinion - (2025) Volume 13, Issue 1

Restoring Resilience: Ecosystems, Climate, and Society

Subel, Khaledian*
*Correspondence: Subel, Khaledian, Department of Biodiversity, Y?ld?z Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, Email:
Department of Biodiversity, Y?ld?z Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

Received: 02-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. jbes-25-172166; Editor assigned: 06-Feb-2025, Pre QC No. P-172166; Reviewed: 20-Jan-2025, QC No. Q-172166; Revised: 23-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. R-172166; Published: 30-Jan-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2332-2543.2025.13.577
Citation: Khaledian, Subel. ”Restoring Resilience: Ecosystems, Climate and Society.” J Biodivers Endanger Species 13 (2025):577.
Copyright: © 2025 Khaledian S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Active ecological restoration, drawing from a comprehensive meta-analysis of 315 studies, is revealed to significantly boost biodiversity, enhance crucial ecosystem functions, and markedly improve overall ecosystem resilience. The findings underscore that intentional restoration efforts are essential for reversing ecological degradation and supporting the recovery of damaged natural environments [1].

Ecological restoration serves as a crucial strategy for enhancing the resilience of marine ecosystems against various environmental stressors, including climate change and direct human impacts. This understanding highlights the importance of deeply understanding underlying ecological processes and implementing carefully tailored restoration techniques to bolster the capacity of marine environments to recover and adapt [2].

Effective strategies for building resilience and adaptive capacity are explored for European forests as they face increasing challenges from climate change. A strong case is made for integrated policy approaches, combining proactive forest management, supportive policy frameworks, and targeted economic incentives to create more robust forest ecosystems capable of enduring future environmental shifts [3].

A social-ecological framework offers a more comprehensive way to understand and manage ecosystem change and resilience. This framework moves beyond purely ecological viewpoints by fully integrating human dimensions, recognizing that human actions and governance structures are fundamentally intertwined with the dynamics and resilience of natural systems [4].

Research focuses squarely on conceptualizing and quantifying marine ecosystem resilience in the face of anthropogenic pressures. It puts forward a practical framework for defining and evaluating resilience, providing tangible indicators and methods to assess how well marine systems can resist, recover from, and adapt to various human-induced disturbances [5].

The intricate connection between climate change, ongoing biodiversity loss, and the inherent resilience of ecosystems is critically examined. Actively maintaining and bolstering ecosystem resilience is paramount for cushioning the impacts of climate change on biodiversity, emphasizing the urgent need for conservation strategies that foster both adaptability and resistance within natural systems [6].

Core principles of ecological resilience can be effectively applied to achieve more sustainable management of marine resources. This advocates for management approaches that actively consider the capacity of marine ecosystems to absorb disturbances and reorganize themselves, moving beyond simply maximizing yield, thereby promoting long-term ocean health and sustainability [7].

A systematic review synthesizes current research on socio-ecological resilience specifically within urban systems. It clearly identifies the key drivers, important indicators, and effective management strategies for enhancing urban resilience, highlighting the complex interplay between social and ecological factors that ultimately determine a city's capacity to cope with and adapt to diverse disturbances [8].

The complex challenge of balancing ecological resilience goals with the pressing needs of local livelihoods in forest landscape restoration initiatives is explored. This strongly advocates for participatory approaches and equitable benefit sharing to ensure that restoration efforts are not only ecologically sound but also socially just and truly sustainable for the communities involved [9].

A conceptual framework is presented for thoroughly understanding and effectively managing ecosystem resilience in a rapidly changing climate. This synthesizes diverse perspectives to emphasize the complex, often non-linear dynamics inherent in ecosystems and highlights the critical necessity for adaptive governance and management strategies that embrace uncertainty while promoting transformative change [10].

Description

Ecological restoration efforts are fundamental to boosting biodiversity, enhancing critical ecosystem functions, and significantly improving the overall resilience of natural environments. These intentional efforts are key to reversing degradation and aiding the recovery of damaged ecosystems [1]. Such work includes developing conceptual frameworks for understanding and managing resilience in the context of a changing climate, recognizing the complex, often non-linear dynamics within ecosystems. Adaptive governance and management strategies that embrace uncertainty are essential to promote transformative change [10].

Specifically for marine ecosystems, restoration is a crucial strategy for building resilience against various environmental stressors, including climate change and direct human impacts [2]. This involves deeply understanding underlying ecological processes and implementing carefully tailored techniques to strengthen marine environments' capacity to recover and adapt. Research also defines and evaluates marine ecosystem resilience to anthropogenic pressures, proposing practical frameworks with tangible indicators and methods to assess how marine systems resist, recover, and adapt to disturbances [5]. Beyond direct restoration, applying ecological resilience principles can lead to more sustainable marine resource management. This means adopting approaches that consider an ecosystem's capacity to absorb disturbances and reorganize, shifting focus from merely maximizing yield to promoting long-term ocean health and sustainability [7].

Terrestrial systems, like European forests, face increasing challenges from climate change, requiring effective strategies for building resilience and adaptive capacity. Integrated policy approaches, proactive forest management, supportive policy frameworks, and targeted economic incentives are vital to foster robust forest ecosystems capable of enduring future environmental shifts [3]. Furthermore, restoration initiatives in forest landscapes grapple with the complex challenge of balancing ecological resilience goals with the pressing needs of local livelihoods. Participatory approaches and equitable benefit sharing are strongly advocated to ensure these efforts are not just ecologically sound but also socially just and sustainable for involved communities [9].

Understanding ecosystem change and resilience often requires a social-ecological framework that moves beyond purely ecological viewpoints to integrate human dimensions. This approach recognizes that human actions and governance structures are fundamentally intertwined with the dynamics and resilience of natural systems [4]. This is particularly evident in urban environments, where a systematic review synthesizes research on socio-ecological resilience. It identifies key drivers, important indicators, and effective management strategies for enhancing urban resilience, emphasizing the complex interplay between social and ecological factors that dictate a city's capacity to cope with and adapt to diverse disturbances [8].

The intricate connection between climate change, ongoing biodiversity loss, and inherent ecosystem resilience is a critical area of focus. Actively maintaining and bolstering ecosystem resilience is paramount for cushioning the impacts of climate change on biodiversity. This underscores an urgent need for conservation strategies that foster both adaptability and resistance within natural systems to ensure long-term ecological stability [6]. Overall, the focus remains on understanding and managing the complex interplay of natural and human systems to ensure the continued health and adaptability of our global ecosystems.

Conclusion

Active ecological restoration significantly enhances biodiversity, crucial ecosystem functions, and the overall resilience of natural systems. These efforts are vital for reversing degradation and supporting recovery, especially in damaged environments. Marine ecosystems, facing climate change and human impacts, benefit greatly from tailored restoration techniques and a deep understanding of underlying ecological processes to boost their recovery and adaptation capabilities. Similarly, efforts are underway to build resilience in European forests against climate change, advocating for integrated policies, proactive management, and economic incentives. A social-ecological framework helps manage ecosystem change by integrating human dimensions, recognizing that actions and governance are intertwined with natural system dynamics. This involves defining and evaluating marine resilience to anthropogenic pressures using practical frameworks, indicators, and assessment methods. Understanding the connection between climate change, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem resilience is critical. Maintaining and bolstering resilience cushions climate impacts, highlighting the need for conservation strategies fostering adaptability. Principles of ecological resilience can also guide sustainable marine resource management, moving beyond yield maximization to promote long-term ocean health. Research also looks at socio-ecological resilience in urban systems, identifying key drivers, indicators, and management strategies to help cities cope with disturbances. In forest restoration, balancing ecological goals with local livelihoods is important, necessitating participatory approaches and equitable benefit sharing. Finally, a conceptual framework helps manage ecosystem resilience in a changing climate by emphasizing complex dynamics, adaptive governance, and transformative change.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  • Zhongqiu L, Jing M, Yangyang L. "Ecological restoration increases biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and resilience: A meta-analysis".Sci Total Environ 905 (2023):167389.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Carlos MD, Susana A, Marilú GD. "Ecological restoration as a strategy to enhance resilience in marine ecosystems".Front Mar Sci 10 (2023):1146761.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Georg W, Robert JA, Metodi SS. "Advancing ecosystem resilience and adaptation in European forests to climate change".For Policy Econ 118 (2020):102220.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Reinette B, Stephen RC, Oonsie B. "Rethinking resilience: A social-ecological framework for understanding and managing ecosystem change".Glob Environ Change 67 (2021):102279.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Laura EW, Alistair RM, David JW. "Defining and evaluating marine ecosystem resilience to anthropogenic pressures".Ecol Indic 116 (2020):106497.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Camille P, Robert JO, Erika GZ. "Climate change and biodiversity: The role of ecosystem resilience".Sci Adv 7 (2021):eabf9958.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Edward TG, Peter CMG, Robert JA. "Leveraging ecological resilience for sustainable marine resource management".Trends Ecol Evol 37 (2022):46-56.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Laura JM, Maria EG, Joshua MS. "Socio-ecological resilience in urban systems: A systematic review".J Urban Ecol 6 (2020):juaa020.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Peter JK, William CLL, Jagannath A. "Forest landscape restoration: Reconciling ecological resilience with local livelihoods".Biol Conserv 278 (2023):109880.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Simon L, Timothy L, Stephen C. "Understanding and managing ecosystem resilience in a changing climate: A conceptual framework".Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 377 (2022):20210291.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

    Google Scholar citation report
    Citations: 624

    Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species received 624 citations as per Google Scholar report

    Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species peer review process verified at publons

    Indexed In

     
    arrow_upward arrow_upward