Private, Scalable Federated Learning for Trustworthy AI

Aurelia Popescu^*
*Correspondence: Aurelia Popescu, Department of Computer Science,, University of Bucharest, Bucharest 050663, Romania, Romania, Email:

Introduction

Federated Learning (FL) fundamentally changes how machine learning models get trained by allowing multiple decentralized clients to collaboratively train a shared global model without directly sharing their raw local data. It tackles data privacy concerns and regulatory hurdles, especially when data is sensitive or geographically distributed. It lays out core principles, explores architectural designs, and touches on significant applications, offering a broad overview of its potential. This enables model building while keeping sensitive information right where it belongs: on the client device [1].

Privacy is paramount in Federated Learning, with surveys exploring how to protect it. It covers a range of techniques, from cryptographic methods like homomorphic encryption and secure multi-party computation to more statistical approaches like differential privacy. While FL offers data non-sharing, private information could still be inferred from model updates. Works categorize and explain privacy-preserving mechanisms, strengthening FL's privacy guarantees effectively [2].

Applying Federated Learning in healthcare is a game-changer, especially with the sensitive nature of patient data. Articles map out a framework for implementing FL in medical contexts, pinpointing opportunities and significant challenges. Hospitals often cannot share patient records, but with FL, they collectively train better diagnostic models using unique datasets, keeping patient information local. Ensuring strict regulatory compliance and dealing with data heterogeneity across medical institutions is a key hurdle [3].

Communication efficiency is a critical bottleneck in Federated Learning, particularly when dealing with many clients or slow network connections. Strategies reduce data exchanged between clients and the central server. Techniques like model compression, quantization, and sparsification aim at shrinking model updates. This makes FL practical and scalable in real-world scenarios, where bandwidth is often limited [4].

Bringing Federated Learning down to edge devices, like smartphones or IoT sensors, presents its own unique set of considerations. This explores how FL can run effectively on resource-constrained devices, which often have limited computation power, battery life, and intermittent network access. It covers architectural modifications and optimization techniques needed to make FL feasible, making distributed intelligence a reality at the data source [5].

Integrating Blockchain with Federated Learning offers a promising avenue for enhancing security, transparency, and trust within the FL ecosystem. Distributed ledger technology manages client participation, secures model updates, and ensures the integrity of the global model. Combining these technologies mitigates single points of failure and malicious attacks, which is key for building resilient and verifiable FL systems [6].

While Federated Learning aims for a shared global model, a 'one-size-fits-all' approach does not always work perfectly for diverse client needs. This addresses the concept of personalized Federated Learning, where the goal is a set of customized models that perform better for individual clients or groups. It covers techniques that balance global model learning with local adaptation, ensuring each client benefits from collaborative training while meeting unique requirements [7].

The choice of optimization algorithm heavily impacts the performance and convergence of Federated Learning models. This dives into various optimization algorithms adapted for FL's distributed nature, moving beyond traditional centralized approaches. It discusses how techniques like FedAvg (Federated Averaging) and its numerous variants handle issues like data heterogeneity, communication costs, and asynchronicity, making FL training efficient across many settings [8].

The intersection of Federated Learning and Reinforcement Learning is gaining traction, promising to extend autonomous decision-making in privacy-sensitive and distributed environments. This explores how these two paradigms combine, where multiple agents collaboratively learn optimal policies without exposing local experiences. This opens possibilities for applications in intelligent transportation systems or robotic swarm coordination, where data sharing is restricted but collective learning is beneficial [9].

Building truly trustworthy Federated Learning systems involves addressing a spectrum of concerns beyond just privacy, encompassing fairness, robustness, and interpretability. This systematically categorizes and analyzes challenges and solutions for achieving trustworthy FL. It ensures models are accurate, private, fair to all contributing clients, resilient against adversarial attacks, and understandable in their decision-making processes. This is about building reliable AI in a federated setting [10].

 

Description

Federated Learning (FL) fundamentally changes how machine learning models get trained. It allows multiple decentralized clients to collaboratively train a shared global model without directly sharing their raw local data [1]. This approach tackles data privacy concerns and regulatory hurdles, especially when data is sensitive or geographically distributed. Privacy is paramount in FL, with surveys exploring how to protect it [2].

Techniques cover cryptographic methods, like homomorphic encryption and secure multi-party computation, alongside statistical approaches, such as differential privacy [2]. While FL offers data non-sharing, private information could still be inferred from model updates. Works categorize and explain privacy-preserving mechanisms, strengthening FL's privacy guarantees. Applying FL in healthcare is transformative, especially with the sensitive nature of patient data [3]. Hospitals often cannot share patient records, but with FL, they collectively train better diagnostic models using unique datasets, keeping patient information local. Ensuring strict regulatory compliance and dealing with data heterogeneity across medical institutions is a key hurdle [3].

Communication efficiency is a critical bottleneck in FL, particularly with many clients or slow network connections [4]. Strategies reduce data exchanged between clients and the central server. Techniques like model compression, quantization, and sparsification aim at shrinking model updates, making FL practical and scalable in real-world scenarios where bandwidth is often limited [4]. Bringing FL down to edge devices, like smartphones or IoT sensors, presents its own unique set of considerations [5]. This explores how FL can run effectively on resource-constrained devices, which often have limited computation power, battery life, and intermittent network access. It covers architectural modifications and optimization techniques needed to make FL feasible, making distributed intelligence a reality right at the data source [5].

Integrating Blockchain with FL offers a promising avenue for enhancing security, transparency, and trust within the FL ecosystem [6]. Distributed ledger technology manages client participation, secures model updates, and ensures the integrity of the global model. Combining these technologies mitigates single points of failure and malicious attacks, which is key for building resilient and verifiable FL systems [6]. A 'one-size-fits-all' approach often does not work perfectly for diverse client needs. Personalized Federated Learning addresses this, focusing on customized models that perform better for individual clients or groups [7]. It covers techniques that balance global model learning with local adaptation, ensuring each client benefits from collaborative training while meeting unique requirements [7].

The choice of optimization algorithm heavily impacts the performance and convergence of FL models [8]. Various optimization algorithms are adapted for the distributed nature of FL, moving beyond traditional centralized approaches. Techniques like FedAvg (Federated Averaging) and its numerous variants handle issues like data heterogeneity, communication costs, and asynchronicity, making FL training efficient across many settings [8]. The intersection of FL and Reinforcement Learning is gaining traction, extending autonomous decision-making in privacy-sensitive and distributed environments [9]. Multiple agents can collaboratively learn optimal policies without exposing local experiences. This opens possibilities for applications in intelligent transportation systems or robotic swarm coordination, where data sharing is restricted but collective learning is beneficial [9].

Building truly trustworthy FL systems involves addressing concerns beyond privacy, encompassing fairness, robustness, and interpretability [10]. This area systematically categorizes and analyzes challenges and solutions for achieving trustworthy FL. It ensures models are accurate, private, fair to all contributing clients, resilient against adversarial attacks, and understandable in their decision-making processes. This is about building reliable Artificial Intelligence in a federated setting [10].

Conclusion

Federated Learning (FL) fundamentally shifts how machine learning models are trained by enabling decentralized clients to collaboratively build a shared global model without direct data sharing. This tackles data privacy and regulatory hurdles, especially for sensitive or geographically distributed information. A key area of focus involves robust privacy-preserving techniques, from cryptographic methods like homomorphic encryption to statistical approaches like differential privacy, which strengthen FL's privacy guarantees. Communication efficiency is another critical challenge, leading to strategies like model compression and quantization that reduce data exchange, making FL practical and scalable in real-world scenarios. The deployment of FL on edge devices, such as smartphones, requires specific architectural modifications and optimization techniques to overcome resource constraints. Furthermore, the field extends to personalized FL, which balances global learning with local adaptation for diverse client needs. Optimization algorithms are also adapted for FL's distributed nature, handling data heterogeneity and asynchronicity. The integration of Blockchain technology offers enhanced security and transparency, while the intersection with Reinforcement Learning promises new avenues for autonomous decision-making. Ultimately, building trustworthy FL systems goes beyond just privacy, encompassing fairness, robustness, and interpretability to ensure reliable Artificial Intelligence in a federated setting.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

Tian L, Anit KS, Junyi Z. "Federated Learning: Principles and Applications".IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 32 (2021):2101-2121.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Praneeth V, Otkrist G, Sai CCG. "Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning: A Comprehensive Survey".IEEE Access 9 (2021):135794-135821.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Micah JS, Brandon E, Garth P. "Federated learning in medicine: framework, challenges, and opportunities".Int. J. Med. Inform. 144 (2020):104279.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Ming Z, Qiaozhi H, Peng S. "Communication-efficient federated learning: A survey".Appl. Intell. 53 (2023):14207-14227.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Mostafa R, Khurram KQ, Kashif A. "Federated learning on edge devices: a survey".Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 15 (2022):2969-2997.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Shiva P, Kien N, Rajasekar V. "Blockchain for Federated Learning: A Survey".IEEE Internet Things J. 10 (2023):13088-13110.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Yang T, Hongzhi W, Jun Z. "Personalized Federated Learning: A Survey".ACM Comput. Surv. 55 (2022):19.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Luqman K, Muhammad T, Qaisar A. "Optimization algorithms for federated learning: A survey".J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 196 (2021):103233.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Jianhua S, Xiaofei W, Weifeng B. "Federated Reinforcement Learning: A Survey".J. Commun. Inf. Netw. 8 (2023):341-360.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Rui X, Qihang S, Yuxin L. "Trustworthy Federated Learning: A Survey".ACM Comput. Surv. 55 (2023):200.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref