GET THE APP

Perceptions of Civil and Structural Engineering
..

Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering

ISSN: 2165-784X

Open Access

Opinion - (2022) Volume 12, Issue 8

Perceptions of Civil and Structural Engineering

Ciaran Reilly*
*Correspondence: Ciaran Reilly, Department of Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika, Poland, Email:
Department of Biochemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika, Poland

Received: 02-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. jcde-22-84091; Editor assigned: 04-Aug-2022, Pre QC No. P-84091; Reviewed: 17-Aug-2022, QC No. Q-84091; Revised: 23-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. R-84091; Published: 31-Aug-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2165-784X.2022.12.467
Citation: Reilly, Ciaran. “Perceptions of Civil and Structural Engineering.” J Civil Environ Eng 12 (2022): 467.
Copyright: © 2022 Reilly C. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

The concept of long-term in-service monitoring has been touted as having the power to fundamentally alter the construction and operation of civil infrastructure and structures. Be that as it may, for common and primary specialists to extricate the best worth from in situ underlying observing there are a scope of functional, social and social obstructions which should be survived. A multi-national survey of 146 participants was conducted to investigate current perceptions of long-term monitoring in civil and structural engineering. The goal of the survey was to learn about participants' perceptions of long-term monitoring, the potential for the integration and use of long-term monitoring in the civil/structural engineering design process in the future, and perceived uncertainties in the existing civil/structural engineering design process. This study reveals that, despite widespread support for long-term monitoring as a tool in the engineering design process, there is a wide range of opinions regarding how it is currently used, little consensus on how it can best benefit civil and structural engineering design, and no direct financial incentive exists to encourage its use in industry. Over the past two decades, in-service or in situ monitoring, which measures the behaviour of structures under in-service loads and environmental conditions, has experienced rapid development as a result of lower hardware costs, increased monitoring technology durability and sensitivity, and improved computation and data storage capabilities.

Description

These developments have primarily focused on the potential advantages that in-situ monitoring may provide for condition assessment, damage detection, and structural health monitoring. On the other hand, more recent research has begun to investigate the possibility that long-term monitoring may provide information that can be used to guide the design of civil structures. A direct method for comparing a structure's predicted behaviour to its actual behaviour is model updating, or updating finite-element models based on measured performance in service. Engineers can now create a virtual model of an asset by integrating design calculations, assumptions, and information about materials and construction with building-information modelling (BIM). As part of Construction or Industry 4.0, the automation and digitization of the construction industry, digital twins, virtual models of assets that have been updated and integrated with real-world measurements and data, have recently made it possible to use long-term monitoring to guide the operation and maintenance of both large infrastructure assets and individual structures. Long-term in-service monitoring's potential to influence and enhance the civil and structural engineering design process has been little studied though [1].

Characterizing perceived uncertainties in the design process is a crucial aspect that must be addressed if long-term monitoring is to inform future designs. This will allow for the identification of areas where long-term monitoring may provide the greatest benefits. In addition, it is necessary to comprehend industry perceptions and current usage of long-term monitoring in order to identify areas of successful implementation and obstacles to its continued use. Broad examination into impression of BIM have featured how BIM's fruitful execution and scattering inside common and underlying designing are to a great extent because of understanding the requests and functionalities expected inside industry. Using current perceptions of unknowns and uncertainties in the engineering design process, the study presented in this paper seeks to identify areas where long-term monitoring may provide engineers with the greatest benefit. It builds on previous research. It also aims to comprehend some of the cultural and social factors that could either facilitate or hinder the incorporation of long-term monitoring into structural and civil design [2,3].

The survey of industry perceptions of long-term monitoring led to the identification of technological solutions that may enable the design process's perceived uncertainties and unknowns to be addressed. Technologies and design methods that may address the study's barriers to widespread adoption of in-situ monitoring to inform civil structure design are also discussed. Digital twins, a technology that has gained widespread acceptance in the manufacturing sector, may provide a straightforward foundation for integrating structural monitoring with the design of civil structures. The survey has shown that there is a lot of industry demand for technologies that make it easier to incorporate long-term monitoring into the design of civil engineering. However, these systems must strike a balance between two competing requirements. The first is accessibility, so that the survey's concerns about the time requirements for analysing structural monitoring data can be addressed. The concerns about interpretability and extrapolation of results to subsequent engineering designs must be balanced with the requirements for accessibility. In practice, this could be accomplished by making sure that parameters measured in situ are reported in the same units or formats as those used in design standards or codes, and that the uncertainty in any extrapolated parameters is made clear and concise. This study surveyed civil and structural engineering professionals from all over the world to find out what they thought about the benefits and potential of long-term monitoring of structures. Among the most important findings 78.3% of respondents mentioned the need for long-term monitoring data in civil and structural engineering to validate design assumptions and produce designs that are more efficient. There is disagreement regarding where this data may be most useful in the design process; while 48.4% of respondents identified the primary use as supporting the adoption of more efficient materials and designs, 51.6% of respondents indicated an interest in the use of long-term monitoring to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes [4,5].

Conclusion

The cost of implementation, mentioned by 46.9% of respondents, and a lack of client demand, mentioned by 31.7% of respondents, are two of the survey's barriers to long-term monitoring adoption. The expansive scope of respondents' subject matters, insight, geological area, and business loans weight to the ends attracted this paper. Key arising advances which might help the reception of long haul checking have been recognized from the writing and possible hindrances to execution talked about. Long-term monitoring can be used to inform future engineering designs, and performance-based design methodologies have been highlighted as an alternative design strategy for civil structures that may lessen the perceived inflexibility of current design codes and standards. The wider legal issues surrounding the use of monitoring data to inform future designs, as well as specific areas in existing design guidance that are sources of either the greatest uncertainty or which most influence design efficiency, should be given priority in future work.

References

  1. Clapham, Maria M. "The convergent validity of the torrance tests of creative thinking and creativity interest inventories." Educ Psychol Meas 64 (2004): 828-841.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Cotrena, Charles, Laura Damiani Branco, Flavio Milman Shansis and Rochele Paz Fonseca. "Executive function impairments in depression and bipolar disorder: Association with functional impairment and quality of life." J Affect Disord 190 (2016): 744-753.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. DuPaul, George J., Lisa L. Weyandt and Sean M. O'Dell, et al. "College students with ADHD: Current status and future directions." J Atten Disord 13 (2009): 234-250.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Atwood, Sara A. and Jean E. Pretz. "Creativity as a factor in persistence and academic achievement of engineering undergraduates." J Eng Educ 105 (2016): 540-559.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Barkley, Russell A. "Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD." Psychol Bull 121 (1997): 65.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1798

Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering received 1798 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward