GET THE APP

Pectin Phase Separation: A Key Mechanism Shaping Plant Cell Wall Architecture and Growth
..

Journal of Phylogenetics & Evolutionary Biology

ISSN: 2329-9002

Open Access

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 11, Issue 3

Pectin Phase Separation: A Key Mechanism Shaping Plant Cell Wall Architecture and Growth

Martina Elite*
*Correspondence: Martina Elite, Department of Phylogenetics, University of Cambridge, Bateman Street, UK, Email:
Department of Phylogenetics, University of Cambridge, Bateman Street, UK

Received: 16-May-2023, Manuscript No. JPGEB-23-106047; Editor assigned: 18-May-2023, Pre QC No. P-106047; Reviewed: 30-May-2023, QC No. Q-106047; Revised: 05-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. R-106047; Published: 12-Jun-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2329-9002.2023.11.271
Citation: Elite, Martina. “Pectin Phase Separation: A Key Mechanism Shaping Plant Cell Wall Architecture and Growth.” J Phylogenetics Evol Biol 11 (2023): 271.
Copyright: © 2023 Elite M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

An increasing corpus of research contends that many biological processes are driven by phase separation occurring within polymer mixtures. Many different roles in cellular metabolism, gene regulation, and signalling are assumed to be played by the development of membrane-less organelles by liquid-liquid phase separation. One of these systems' traits is that it is poised at the edge of a phase transition, which makes it ideal for inducing strong cellular reactions to frequently extremely little changes in the cell's “environment.” Recent research suggests that phase separation may be a driving force for cell wall expansion in the semisolid environment of plant cell walls, as well as a factor in wall patterning, hydration, and stress relaxation during growth.

Keywords

Membrane-less organelles • Phase separation• Cell wall expansion

Introduction

When the interaction energy favouring like neighbours and disfavoring unlike neighbours exceeds the mixing entropy of polymers, liquid-liquid phase separation occurs. See for a great introduction to the physics of phase separation in biology. Many regulatory processes in the cell are thought to influence phase separation, such as posttranslational modifications that change the strength of interactions between cellular components. Increasing polymer affinity transforms liquid droplets in the cytosol into a gel, where the crosslink lifetime distinguishes between liquid and solid behaviour. Interestingly, gels can exhibit spectacular reversible volume transitions caused by phase separation of the gel into high and low density domains in response to small environmental changes. The semi-solid environment of plant cell walls also experiences phase separation, which contributes to their remarkable nanoscale organisation and materiality.

After reaching an equilibrium, this layer phase separates via an as-yet unknown mechanism, resulting in more dense aggregates that form highly reproducible patterns. These surface patterns are stabilised by impregnation with sporopollinin, a highly resistant polymer composed of long chain fatty acids and phenolics secreted by adjacent tapetum cells. The primexin phase separation is kinetically arrested in some species, presumably due to premature sporopollinin release, resulting in variable deposition patterns. These arrested patterns appear to evolve faster than equilibrium patterns. Another example is the cell wall maturation of the singlecelled freshwater desmid alga P. margaritaceum. Desmids are Charophycean green algae that have a similar cell wall composition to land plants, including an important role for pectins in cell wall architecture [1].

Literature Review

Pectin fibrils with diameters ranging from 20 to 30 nm have been reported to extend into the lumen from the corners of poplar xylem fibre cells. The authors proposed that these hydrophilic fibres play a role in water storage in the xylem. As with previous research, these structures can be species, cell type, and even subcellular location specific. The presence of pectin fibrils begs the question of how the HG chains came to be uni-axial. Is this due to interaction with equally oriented cellulose, a self-assembling nematic crystalline phase, or oriented deposition? The latter, seemingly contradictory possibility should not be dismissed given the precedent of tubular exocytosis in neurons and the recent discovery of extracellular vesicular-tubular structures.

How cell wall metabolism can control cell expansion and plant growth is a major mystery in plant biology. According to the acid growth theory, the growth hormone auxin promotes turgor-driven cell expansion by promoting cell wall acidification, which increases cell wall extensibility. Numerous studies on isolated cell walls have found acid-induced "creep," or long-term plastic deformation of the cell wall. Expansins have been identified as the proteinaceous agents responsible for acid-induced creep. These proteins appear to specifically remove the aforementioned cellulose-xyloglucancellulose crosslinks via a non-enzymatic mechanism that is still unknown. In the context of living expanding cells, this activity, which is characterised on isolated and heat-inactivated walls, appears to be only a part of the picture. The removal of cellulose-XG crosslinks was catalysed by sin.

Discussion

Cellulose is the most condensed phase in the cell wall, consisting of semi-crystalline microfibrils made up of multiple β-1,4 linked glucan chains. Microfibrils are formed by hexameric complexes in the plasma membrane, with each globule containing three distinct catalytic subunits. The proximity of these subunits within the complex ensures the aggregation of 18 parallel glucan chains into elementary microfibrils with typical diameters of 3 nm. Depending on the nature of the matrix polymers present during deposition, these elementary microfibrils can form higher order aggregates. Indeed, some matrix polymers or polymer domains, such as certain xyloglucan, xylan, and pectin species, readily condense onto cellulose and act either as double-sided tape crosslinking microfibrils or as a sterically and electrostatically repulsive barrier.

The remarkable ability of pollen grains and seeds to dehydrate and rehydrate is one of the characteristics of seed plants' success in colonising terrestrial habitats. Volume transitions in pectin gels can occur during rehydration processes. Below the exine layer of dicot pollen grains is an intine layer rich in pectin. This pectin's de-methylesterification prior to germination is required for normal pollen hydration and germination. Indeed, a mutation in one of the 13 PME genes expressed in Arabidopsis pollen resulted in significantly delayed pollen swelling and germination. According to a recent study on chemically deesterified sunflower pollen, swelling is driven by pectin charges and limited by Ca2+ crosslinks. Indeed, neutralising the charges at low pH prevented swelling and chelator removal of Ca2+ with a chelator at neutral pH [2].

The fungus attacks the bark of hazelnut trees, causing cankers and branch girdling. This reduces nutrient and water uptake, resulting in stunted growth, dieback, and eventual tree also known as grey mould, is a fungal disease that affects the hazelnut's flowers, buds, leaves, and nuts. The fungus causes a grayish-brown mould to grow on the affected areas, resulting in a lower yield and quality of nuts. Powdery mildew is a fungal disease caused by various Erysiphe species. The disease attacks hazelnut leaves, flowers, and young nuts, causing white powdery patches to appear on the affected parts. The disease can reduce crop yield and quality.

The presence of a specialised outer cell wall, which yields to the pressure of the swelling gel at predefined fragile spots at cell edges, where the cell wall is thinner, facilitates mucilage release from the Arabidopsis seed coat. According to a recent elegant study, the formation of these fragile spots requires the local action of the peroxidase PRX36. Cell wall thinning at this site can be explained by cell wall densification caused by PRX36-catalyzed oxidative crosslinking of cell wall polymers, though other scenarios involving hydroxyl-mediated polymer cleavage cannot be ruled out. Interestingly, the authors demonstrated that RFP-tagged cell edges require the PME inhibitor to be targeted. Immunofluorescence experiments revealed that this inhibitor, most likely in conjunction with an unidentified PME [3-5].

Conclusion

Phase separation in polymer mixtures has emerged as a fundamental mechanism governing biological processes, no t only within cellular compartments but also in the extracellular matrix of plant cells. This review highlights recent findings that demonstrate the widespread involvement of phase separation in various aspects of plant cell wall organization and growth. Examples include the spatial organization of exine in pollen grains, surface features of Penium cells, regulated hydration of pollen grains and seed mucilage, and recruitment of cell wall modifying enzymes in specific wall domains of seed coat cells. Furthermore, pH induced changes in pectin assemblies and enzyme-regulated volume transitions in crystalline pectin fibers are implicated in cell wall expansion. The integration of glycochemistry, soft matter physics, and cell biology has opened up new avenues for understanding cell wall architecture, plant growth, and potentially abiotic stress resistance and immunity. The study of co-evolved polymer assemblies in plant cell walls also inspires the development of functional nanomaterials. Moreover, this review raises intriguing questions about the applicability of these concepts to cell walls in other biochemically distinct organisms such as algae, bacteria, oomycetes, or fungi. The intersection of diverse disciplines promises an exciting era in plant cell wall research, offering insights into fundamental processes and providing opportunities for innovation in materials science.

Acknowledgement

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by authors.

References

  1. Carlsson, Sigrid V. and Andrew J. Vickers. "Screening for prostate cancer." Med Clin 104 (2020): 1051-1062.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Roobol, Monique J. "The prostate-specific antigen test." Expert Opin Med Diagn 7 (2013): 423-426.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Qureshi, Sohail A., Muhammed Umair Bashir and Ahmed Yaqinuddin. "Utility of DNA methylation markers for diagnosing cancer." Int J Surg 8 (2010): 194-198.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Grossman, David C., Susan J. Curry, Douglas K. Owens and Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, et al. "Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement." Jama 319 (2018): 1901-1913.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Sung, Hyuna, Jacques Ferlay, Rebecca L. Siegel and Mathieu Laversanne, et al. "Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries." CA Cancer J Clin 71 (2021): 209-249.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 911

Journal of Phylogenetics & Evolutionary Biology received 911 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Phylogenetics & Evolutionary Biology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward