GET THE APP

Methods Engineering and workplace design
..

Industrial Engineering & Management

ISSN: 2169-0316

Open Access

Perspective - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 2

Methods Engineering and workplace design

Wang Hui*
*Correspondence: Wang Hui, Department of Management Studies, University of Wolverhampton, UK, Email:
Department of Management Studies, University of Wolverhampton, UK

Received: 05-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. iem-22-58189; Editor assigned: 07-Feb-2022, Pre QC No. P-58189; Reviewed: 12-Feb-2022, QC No. Q-58189; Revised: 17-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. R-58189; Published: 22-Feb-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2169-0316.22.11.340
Citation: Hui, Wang. “Methods Engineering and Workplace Design.” J Ind Eng Manag 11 (2022): 340. DOI: 10.37421/2169-0316.22.11.340
Copyright: © 2022 Hui W. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Methods engineering is a way for designing and improving work methods that is based on a systematic approach. It provides a unified and comprehensive system for (a) analyzing the current work situation, identifying problems, generating improvement ideas, and selecting the best of them, as well as (b) standardizing new methods, ensuring their adoption, and measuring and evaluating their impact after they have been implemented. Methods engineering has broadened its application to encompass indirect labor, office work, and service work, and the focus has switched to the creation of new work systems that did not exist before. Similarly, the ultimate objectives for the application of methods engineering have widened to encompass such goals as ergonomic balance between the operator and the work system and ecological adaptation of the work system to the environment. Technique’s engineering is a methodical approach to the development and improvement of work methods, as well as their introduction into the workplace and steady adoption. Work measurement is the other of the two-core industrial engineering (IE) techniques, and methods engineering is one of them. These two were, in fact, the foundation of IE, and they have been intensively investigated and widely utilized. Later, the numerous IE approaches were developed, and their application area was greatly enlarged.

Description

Methods engineering is a unified and comprehensive system for (a) analyzing the current work situation, identifying problems, generating improvement ideas, and selecting the best of those, and (b) standardizing new methods, ensuring their adoption, and measuring and evaluating their impact after they have been implemented. As a result, methods engineering has long served as a foundation for the evolution of IE, and other IE techniques have expanded the scope of methods engineering use and led to its further development and refinement. In the past, methods engineering was primarily concerned with improving manufacturing processes and operations, but in recent years, its scope has expanded to include indirect labor, office work, and service work. Similarly, in the past, the primary focus was on improving existing work systems; however, in recent years, the focus of methods engineering has turned to the creation of new work systems that did not exist before. Similarly, the goal of using methods engineering to develop and improve work systems has extended. Whereas in the past, the goal was to increase labor productivity, today's goals include achieving an ergonomic balance between the operator and the work system, as well as adapting the work system to the environment.

When using methods engineering to make changes or designs, it is best to follow a set procedure. This technique should be explained before beginning actual actions, as it will provide the following advantages:

• It is possible to gain a good understanding among all parties concerned ahead of time.

• Improvement operations will be more efficient, resulting in less wasted effort.

• By focusing on the current phase, the quality of work completed for each step will improve.

• It is simple to keep track of development.

For nearly a century, methods engineering has served as a critical industrial engineering field. This tenacity is proof enough that, as we enter the twentyfirst century, this technique is still relevant. In fact, when a factory’s production engineering personnel and technicians solve system improvement difficulties, procedures engineering remains the primary technology they employ. Furthermore, this technology is crucial not only for industrial and manufacturing engineers and those involved in production technology; it is also considered fundamental information for engineers in other domains, such as product design and electrical, mechanical, and chemical engineering. Its significance isn't confined to so-called professionals like engineers and technicians, either. It can also produce good results when utilized as the primary tool in the hands of employees in general when doing kaizen or small group activities. Finally, while methods engineering was originally used to improve industrial shop floors, its scope of application has recently been expanded to cover indirect labor, office work, service work, and the like, suggesting that its effectiveness and importance have not diminished. It's possible that today's work systems aren't flawless. Many flaws exist in freshly constructed work systems, and there will be room for development through improvement activities [1-5].

Conclusion

The purpose of methods engineering is to use it indefinitely to bring these defective work systems closer to perfect work systems (or, as Toyota puts it, "the relentless pursuit of perfection"). Methods engineering will almost certainly become more important in the future. Workplace systems in the modern era have already advanced to a high level. The components that make up these systems are numerous, and the elements themselves are growing more complicated as automation, precision, and specialization continue to advance.

References

  1. Chaffin, Don B. "Human motion simulation for vehicle and workplace design." Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 17 (2007): 475-484.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Sanchez-Lite, Alberto, Manuel Garcia, Rosario Domingo, and Miguel Angel Sebastian. "Novel ergonomic postural assessment method (NERPA) using product-process computer aided engineering for ergonomic workplace design." PloS one 8(2013): e72703.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Arzi, Yohanan. "Methods engineering: using rapid prototype and virtual reality techniques." Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 72(1997): 79-95.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Baxter, Gordon, and Ian Sommerville. "Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering." Interact Comput 23 (2011): 4-17.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Golabchi, Alireza, SangHyeok Han, JoonOh Seo, SangUk Han et al.  "An automated biomechanical simulation approach to ergonomic job analysis for workplace design." J Constr Eng Manag 141 (2015): 04015020.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 739

Industrial Engineering & Management received 739 citations as per Google Scholar report

Industrial Engineering & Management peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

arrow_upward arrow_upward