GET THE APP

Managing Paediatric Condylar Trauma: A Comprehensive Approach
..

Journal of Trauma & Treatment

ISSN: 2167-1222

Open Access

Short Communication - (2023) Volume 12, Issue 3

Managing Paediatric Condylar Trauma: A Comprehensive Approach

Lee Heng*
*Correspondence: Lee Heng, Department of Neurology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore, Email:
Department of Neurology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore

Received: 18-Apr-2023, Manuscript No. JTM-23-103533; Editor assigned: 20-Apr-2023, Pre QC No. P-103533; Reviewed: 05-May-2023, QC No. Q-103533; Revised: 10-May-2023, Manuscript No. R-103533; Published: 17-May-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2167-1222.2023.12.564
Citation: Heng, Lee. “Managing Paediatric Condylar Trauma: A Comprehensive Approach.” J Trauma Treat 12 (2023): 564.
Copyright: © 2023 Heng L. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Paediatric condylar trauma, involving the mandibular condyle, is a challenging and complex issue in the field of paediatric maxillofacial surgery. This introduction provides an overview of the importance of managing paediatric condylar trauma and emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach in its management. The mandibular condyle plays a crucial role in the growth and development of the jaw and occlusion. Trauma to this region in the paediatric population can have significant implications for facial aesthetics, occlusal stability, and long-term functional outcomes. However, managing paediatric condylar trauma poses unique challenges compared to adult cases due to the ongoing growth and development of the craniofacial skeleton. A comprehensive approach is essential for the successful management of paediatric condylar trauma. It involves a thorough understanding of the biomechanics, growth patterns, and functional requirements specific to the paediatric population. Moreover, careful clinical and radiographic assessments are necessary to determine the extent of the injury, identify associated fractures, and assess the impact on the developing occlusion [1,2].

The management of paediatric condylar trauma encompasses a spectrum of treatment options ranging from conservative measures, such as observation and physiotherapy, to surgical interventions such as closed reduction, open reduction with internal fixation, or even condylar reconstruction. The decisionmaking process must take into account the age of the patient, the severity and displacement of the fracture, the functional impact, and the potential for future growth and development.

Additionally, interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial in the management of paediatric condylar trauma. Close coordination between paediatric maxillofacial surgeons, orthodontists, pediatric dentists, and other relevant specialists ensures a holistic and patient-centered approach. The multidisciplinary team considers factors such as the skeletal age, dental maturity, and future growth potential to tailor the treatment plan accordingly.

Description

Managing paediatric condylar trauma requires a comprehensive approach that encompasses various aspects of assessment, decision-making, and treatment. This section provides a detailed description of the key considerations involved in the management of paediatric condylar trauma, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and tailoring treatment plans to the unique needs of paediatric patients. Assessment is a crucial initial step in managing paediatric condylar trauma. Clinical evaluation involves a thorough examination of the facial asymmetry, occlusion, and range of mandibular motion. Additionally, radiographic imaging, such as panoramic radiographs, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), or Conventional Computed Tomography (CT), provides detailed information about the fracture pattern, condylar displacement, associated fractures, and any potential impact on the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ). These assessments aid in determining the severity of the fracture and guide treatment decisions [3].

Treatment planning for paediatric condylar trauma should consider the age of the patient, the stage of craniofacial growth and development, and the functional impact of the injury. Conservative management approaches, such as observation and physiotherapy, may be appropriate for minimally displaced or nondisplaced fractures in younger children with potential for spontaneous healing. Physiotherapy techniques, including jaw exercises and functional appliance therapy, can help promote mandibular growth and functional recovery.

In cases where intervention is necessary, closed reduction under general anesthesia may be considered for displaced fractures. This approach involves manually repositioning the fractured condyle and stabilizing it with Intermaxillary Fixation (IMF) or elastic bands. Careful monitoring is crucial post-reduction to ensure stable occlusion and adequate healing. Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) may be indicated for more complex fractures or fractures with significant displacement. The use of miniplates and screws provides stable fixation and allows for precise anatomical reduction [4]. However, the decision to pursue ORIF should consider factors such as the age of the patient, risk of growth disturbance, and the surgeon's expertise.

In cases where condylar reconstruction is necessary, autogenous grafts or alloplastic materials may be utilized to restore condylar height and contour. These reconstructive procedures aim to optimize facial symmetry, occlusal stability, and TMJ function [5]. However, the use of these techniques must be carefully considered in growing patients, as they can impact subsequent growth and development. Interdisciplinary collaboration is paramount in managing paediatric condylar trauma. Paediatric maxillofacial surgeons, orthodontists, pediatric dentists, and other specialists work together to develop a comprehensive treatment plan that considers the functional, esthetic, and psychosocial needs of the patient. Orthodontic treatment may be necessary to address occlusal discrepancies, dental alignment, and skeletal growth patterns. Furthermore, long-term follow-up is essential to monitor growth and development, assess occlusion, and manage any potential complications or late-onset skeletal changes. The management of paediatric condylar trauma is not without challenges and potential complications. Growth disturbances, such as condylar hypoplasia or hyperplasia, can occur following injury and subsequent treatment. These disturbances may lead to facial asymmetry, malocclusion, and functional limitations. Therefore, long-term monitoring and management are crucial to detect and address any potential growth disturbances [6].

Conclusion

Managing paediatric condylar trauma requires a comprehensive and patient-centered approach that considers the unique growth and development aspects of the paediatric population. Interdisciplinary collaboration, careful assessment, and tailored treatment planning are essential for optimizing outcomes. Whether through conservative management, closed reduction, open reduction with internal fixation, or condylar reconstruction, the goal is to restore function, aesthetics, and occlusal stability while minimizing the risk of growth disturbances. Long-term follow-up and monitoring are crucial for detecting and managing potential complications. By implementing a comprehensive approach, clinicians can provide effective and individualized care for paediatric patients with condylar trauma.

Acknowledgement

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

  1. Bournazos, Adam M., Lisa G. Riley, Shobhana Bommireddipalli and Lesley Ades, et al. “Standardized practices for RNA diagnostics using clinically accessible specimens reclassifies 75% of putative splicing variants.” Genet Med 24 (2022): 130-145.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Dobin, Alexander, Carrie A. Davis, Felix Schlesinger and Jorg Drenkow, et al. “STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.” Bioinformatics 29 (2013): 15-21.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Robinson, James T., Helga Thorvaldsdóttir, Wendy Winckler and Mitchell Guttman, et al. “Integrative genomics viewer.” Nat Biotechnol 29 (2011): 24-26.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Kumar, Raman, Mark A. Corbett, Nicholas JC Smith and Daniella H. Hock, et al. “Oligonucleotide correction of an intronic TIMMDC1 variant in cells of patients with severe neurodegenerative disorder.” NPJ Genom Med 7 (2022): 9.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Tyanova, Stefka, Tikira Temu, Pavel Sinitcyn and Arthur Carlson, et al. “The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote) omics data.” Nature Method13 (2016): 731-740.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Rath, Sneha, Rohit Sharma, Rahul Gupta and Tslil Ast, et al. “MitoCarta3. 0: An updated mitochondrial proteome now with sub-organelle localization and pathway annotations.” Nucleic Acids Res 49 (2021): D1541-D1547.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1048

Journal of Trauma & Treatment received 1048 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Trauma & Treatment peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward