GET THE APP

Low Back Pain and Lumbar Spine in Patients
..

Journal of Spine

ISSN: 2165-7939

Open Access

Perspective - (2021) Volume 10, Issue 12

Low Back Pain and Lumbar Spine in Patients

Peter G Passias*
*Correspondence: Peter G Passias, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, United States, Email:
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Temple University, United States

Received: 08-Dec-2021 Published: 29-Dec-2021
Citation: Passias, Peter G. “Low Back Pain and Lumbar Spine in Patients.” J Spine 10 (2021): 514.
Copyright: © 2021 Passias PG, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Perspective

               Osteoarthritis (OA) of the lumbar spine is quite prevalent, with prevalence various estimates from 40 to 85 per cent. The debilitating process of the spine is commonly referred to as OA (disc space narrowing with the formation of vertebral osteophytes); however, anatomy, the facet joint is the only synovial joint in the spinal column that has a pathological debilitating process that is similar to that of anterior joints. Low back pain (LBP) is also a widespread ailment, with approximately 80% of Americans suffering from it at some point during their lives. Many clinical and scientific issues arise from the intricate link between spine radiography and LBP. There are no specific conservative therapies for spine degeneration; nevertheless, there has been new interest in using exercise therapy to treat persistent LBP to some mild advantages. More population-based studies in the areas of genetics, biomarkers, and pain pathways could help in understanding the link between spine degeneration and LBP. Low back pain is one of the most prevalent reasons for visits to the doctor in the United States, and it has a significant socioeconomic impact. Numerous researches have focused on the diagnosis and management of this burden as a result of it. New technologies have been quickly adopted in the hopes of improving our grasp of the disease's physiopathology and assisting us in reducing pain and discomfort in patients. Unfortunately, past research has not been able to show that increased use of advanced imaging equipment is linked to better patient outcomes. This article contrasts evidence-based practises with ones that are widespread or heterogeneous but unsupported by research.

              The significance of Medic vertebral endplate and marrow alterations is still debated two decades after they were first described. These changes are tightly linked to the lumbar spine's regular degenerative process, and their frequency rises with age. However, the specific pathophysiology behind these changes, as well as their relationship to lumbar spine segmental instability and low back pain, remain unknown. We review the literature and discuss the currently existing data about the pathologic and clinical importance of Medic alterations in this paper. Lumbar fusion is a surgical treatment that joins or fuses two or more vertebrae to eliminate uncomfortable mobility in a spinal segment. Despite the fact that the surgery produces a high rate of radiographic fusion, many patients report discomfort, functional handicap, inability to return to work, and long-term narcotic pain relief use after the procedure. This review of the literature uses the bio psychosocial model of low back pain as a framework to examine the biological, psychological, and social components that have been linked to these unfavourable consequences. The data imply that preoperative clinical features may account for at least some of the heterogeneity in postoperative outcomes, and they support the theory of a link between bio psychosocial variables and low back dysfunction. The review also identifies a knowledge vacuum in the area of bio psychosocial determinants of long-term opioid usage after lumbar fusion.

               About 45 per cent of all pregnant women have pain in the lumbosacral portion of the spinal column and the pelvis. The musculoskeletal system is affected by gravity centre migration, which causes changes in body posture during pregnancy. The most prevalent causes of spine pain include joint, ligament, and myofascial dysfunctions, as well as discomfort in the lumbosacral region and pelvis. The goal of this study is to summarise the current state of knowledge on lumbar spine pain in expectant mothers, with a focus on pain associated with muscle, joint, and ligament abnormalities. Pregnancy puts a lot of strain on a woman's osteo-skeletal system. Lumbar pain in various locations and intensities is a harmful side effect of changing positions during pregnancy. Pharmacotherapy may be useful only in cases of severe low back pain, with a limited range of medications that are safe to use during pregnancy. Physical treatment, which includes manual therapy exercises, massage, and local anaesthetic procedures, are other options for pregnant women with low back discomfort.

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2022

Journal of Spine received 2022 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Spine peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

arrow_upward arrow_upward