GET THE APP

Exploring the Rise of Non-surgical Rhinoplasty: A Narrative Review
..

Journal of Surgery

ISSN: [Jurnalul de chirurgie]
ISSN: 1584-9341

Open Access

Commentary - (2024) Volume 20, Issue 1

Exploring the Rise of Non-surgical Rhinoplasty: A Narrative Review

Maria Treva*
*Correspondence: Maria Treva, Department of Otolaryngology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA, Email:
Department of Otolaryngology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021, USA

Received: 01-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. JOS-24-129949; Editor assigned: 02-Jan-2024, Pre QC No. P-129949; Reviewed: 17-Jan-2024, QC No. Q-129949; Revised: 23-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. R-129949; Published: 31-Jan-2024 , DOI: 10.37421/1584-9341.2024.20.134
Citation: Treva, Maria. “Exploring the Rise of Non-surgical Rhinoplasty: A Narrative Review.” J Surg 20 (2024): 134.
Copyright: © 2024 Treva M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Rhinoplasty, often referred to as a "nose job," has been a cornerstone of facial plastic surgery for decades, offering individuals the opportunity to enhance nasal aesthetics and improve facial harmony. Traditionally, rhinoplasty has been performed using surgical techniques to reshape the nasal bones, cartilage, and soft tissue. While surgical rhinoplasty remains highly effective, it is associated with inherent risks, downtime, and surgical complications. In recent years, there has been a shift towards non-surgical approaches to nasal reshaping, driven by advancements in injectable filler technology and increasing patient demand for minimally invasive procedures. This narrative review explores the emergence of non-surgical rhinoplasty as a new trend in nasal aesthetics, examining its indications, techniques, outcomes, safety profile, and patient satisfaction.

Non-surgical rhinoplasty is indicated for individuals seeking to address minor nasal imperfections, such as dorsal humps, nasal asymmetry, saddle deformities, or mild dorsal concavities. It is particularly suitable for patients who desire subtle changes to their nasal appearance without undergoing surgery or experiencing prolonged downtime. Candidates for non-surgical rhinoplasty should have realistic expectations regarding the achievable outcomes and understand the limitations of injectable fillers in nasal reshaping.

Non-surgical rhinoplasty involves the strategic injection of hyaluronic acid-based fillers into specific areas of the nose to augment, camouflage, or correct nasal contours. The procedure is typically performed as an outpatient office-based procedure under topical or local anesthesia [1]. Prior to treatment, the nasal anatomy is carefully assessed, and the desired aesthetic goals are discussed with the patient. Injectable fillers are then injected using a fine-gauge needle or cannula to sculpt the nasal shape and achieve the desired cosmetic outcome. The procedure usually takes less than 30 minutes to complete, and patients can resume their normal activities immediately afterward.

Description

Non-surgical rhinoplasty can yield impressive aesthetic results, including smoother nasal contours, improved symmetry, and enhanced nasal projection. The use of hyaluronic acid fillers provides immediate volumetric correction, allowing patients to see the effects of treatment immediately. However, it is essential to emphasize that the results of non-surgical rhinoplasty are temporary and may last for 12-18 months, depending on the type of filler used and individual factors. Complications associated with non-surgical rhinoplasty are generally mild and transient, including bruising, swelling, redness, and injection site reactions. Serious complications such as vascular compromise or tissue necrosis are rare but can occur, emphasizing the importance of proper injection technique and anatomical knowledge.

While non-surgical rhinoplasty offers several advantages, it's essential to consider its limitations and compare it to traditional surgical rhinoplasty. Surgical rhinoplasty remains the gold standard for addressing complex nasal deformities, structural abnormalities, and functional issues such as nasal obstruction. Surgical techniques allow for precise manipulation of nasal structures, enabling comprehensive reshaping and correction of anatomical features. Additionally, surgical rhinoplasty provides permanent results, offering long-term satisfaction for patients seeking enduring nasal aesthetics.

Non-surgical rhinoplasty has inherent limitations and may not be suitable for all patients or all types of nasal deformities. The use of injectable fillers is primarily indicated for soft tissue augmentation and camouflaging, rather than structural changes or reduction of nasal size. Patients with significant nasal asymmetry, septal deviations, or nasal obstruction may require surgical intervention to achieve optimal results. Furthermore, the temporary nature of injectable fillers necessitates periodic touch-up treatments, which can incur additional costs and inconvenience for patients [2].

Patient education and informed consent are critical aspects of the decision-making process for both surgical and non-surgical rhinoplasty. Clinicians should discuss the benefits, risks, and limitations of each approach, taking into account the patient's aesthetic goals, anatomical considerations, and preferences [3]. While non-surgical rhinoplasty may offer a less invasive option for certain patients, surgical rhinoplasty remains the preferred choice for individuals seeking comprehensive nasal reshaping and permanent results. A thorough preoperative evaluation, including a detailed discussion of expectations and realistic outcomes, is essential to ensure patient satisfaction and safety.

Patient satisfaction with non-surgical rhinoplasty is generally high, with many individuals reporting improved self-confidence and satisfaction with their nasal appearance [4,5]. The minimally invasive nature of the procedure, along with minimal downtime and rapid recovery, contributes to high patient acceptance and preference for non-surgical rhinoplasty over traditional surgical approaches. However, it is essential for patients to understand the limitations of non-surgical rhinoplasty and the need for periodic touch-up treatments to maintain optimal results. Additionally, patients should be aware of the importance of choosing a qualified and experienced injector to minimize the risk of complications and ensure safe and effective outcomes.

Conclusion

The rise of non-surgical rhinoplasty reflects a broader trend towards minimally invasive cosmetic procedures and patient-driven aesthetic preferences. As technology continues to evolve and new filler formulations become available, the future of non-surgical rhinoplasty holds promise for further advancements in nasal aesthetics. Ongoing research efforts are focused on optimizing filler formulations, refining injection techniques, and exploring novel approaches to address a wider range of nasal deformities. By embracing innovation and maintaining a patient-centered approach, nonsurgical rhinoplasty has the potential to reshape the landscape of nasal aesthetics and offer individuals safe, effective, and minimally invasive options for nasal enhancement.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Ghanaatpisheh, Mohammad, Ali Sajjadian and Rollin K. Daniel. "Superior rhinoplasty outcomes with precise nasal osteotomy: An individualized approach for maintaining function and achieving aesthetic goals." Aesthetic Surg J 35 (2015): 28-39.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Locketz, Garrett D., Kirkland N. Lozada and Daniel G. Becker. "Osteotomies—when, why, and how?." Facial Facial Plast Surg 36 (2020): 057-065.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Bracaglia, Roberto, R. Fortunato and Stefano Gentileschi. "Double lateral osteotomy in aesthetic rhinoplasty." Br J Plast Surg 57 (2004): 156-159.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Alqahtani, N. D., R. Alshammari, K. Almoammar and N. Almosa, et al. "Post-orthodontic cephalometric variations in bimaxillary protrusion cases managed by premolar extraction–A retrospective study." Niger J Clin Pract 22 (2019): 1530-1538.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Liu, Yan, Zhen-Jin Yang, Jing Zhou and Ping Xiong, et al. "Soft tissue changes in patients with dentoalveolar protrusion treated with maximum anchorage: A systematic review and meta-analysis." J Évid Based Dent Pract 19 (2019): 101310.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 288

Journal of Surgery received 288 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Surgery peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward