GET THE APP

Editorial Note on Blood Biomarker
..

Journal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis

ISSN: 2155-9929

Open Access

Editorial - (2022) Volume 13, Issue 1

Editorial Note on Blood Biomarker

Sanike Swapna*
*Correspondence: Sanike Swapna, Department of Biotechnology, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, Email:
Department of Biotechnology, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Received: 03-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. Jmbd-22-56407; Editor assigned: 05-Jan-2022, Pre QC No. P-56407; Reviewed: 08-Jan-2022, QC No. Q-56407; Revised: 13-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. R-56407; Published: 18-Jan-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/ jmbd.2022.11.507.
Citation: Swapna, Sanike. “Editorial Note on Blood Biomarker.” J Mol Biomark Diagn 13 (2022): 507.
Copyright: © 2022 Swapna S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Editorial

Biomarker, or biological marker, refers to a broad vary of measures that capture what's happening in a very cell or organism at a given moment. Biomarkers are objective medical signs as critical symptoms reported by the patient accustomed measure the presence or progress of illness, or the consequences of treatment. Biomarkers will have molecular, histologic, photography, or physiological characteristics. Samples of biomarkers embody everything from force per unit area and pulse rate to basic metabolic studies and X-ray findings to advanced histological and genetic tests of blood and alternative tissues. Biomarkers area unit measurable and don't outline however an individual feels or functions.

Although the term biomarker is comparatively new, medical signs are utilized in clinical follow for hundreds of years. Several biomarkers, like pulse rate, diagnosing and blood lead levels, area unit normally used and wellresearched. With the increase of genetic science and alternative advances in biology, new biomarker studies have entered a promising era with potential for early identification and effective, personalised treatment of the many diseases. In clinical trials, biomarkers will function intermediate markers of an illness and facilitate confirm if a particular medical care is effectively treating that illness. The additional typical approach of victimization endpoints like quality of life or mortality in clinical studies will create accruing enough knowledge each time and price preventive. Employing a biomarker-driven approach could shorten clinical test time and speed up development and restrictive approval.

Molecular have biophysical properties, which permit their measurements in biological samples eg, plasma, serum, bodily fluid, bronchoalveolar irrigation, biopsy, photography obtained from imaging studies, histological replicate organic chemistry or molecular alteration in cells, tissues or fluids, physical measures of body processes. Neurodegenerative diseases cause progressive harm and death to nerve cells. This ends up in issues in thought, attention, and memory. Reliable and accessible biomarkers would alter the first identification and treatment of such diseases. One potential biomarker could be a macromolecule referred to as neurofilament lightweight chain NfL.

NfL is discharged once nerve cells area unit broken. Elevated NfL concentrations area unit found in bodily fluid (CSF) in most neurodegenerative disorders. However CSF assortment is associate degree invasive procedure. This limits the utilization of CSF NFL for routine identification. Cardiac biomarkers show up in your blood once your heart has been underneath severe stress and becomes blistered as a result of it's not obtaining enough element. This can be as a result of you having had an attack. However these levels will be high for alternative reasons. The amount of biomarkers area unit usually accustomed quickly determines the dimensions of an attack and the way seriously your heart was affected. Cardiac troponin.

This macromolecule is far and away the foremost normally used biomarker. It’s the best known sensitivity. It enters into your blood before long once an attack. It conjointly stays in your blood days in spite of everything alternative biomarkers return to traditional levels. 2 sorts of troponin are also measured: troponin T and troponin I. Troponin I is extremely specific to the guts and stays higher longer than creatinine kinase-MB. Current tips from the yank Heart Association (AHA) say this is often the most effective biomarker for locating a attack. The AHA says to limit use of the opposite biomarkers. These embody CK, CK-MB, and hemoprotein.

Creatinine enzyme (CK). This protein may be measured many times over a 24-hour amount. It usually a minimum of double if you have had an attack. However as a result of levels of CK will go up in several alternative conditions besides an attack, it's not terribly specific. CK-MB. This is often a subtype of CK. its additional sensitive for locating heart harm from an attack. CK-MB raises four to six hours once an attack. however it's usually back to traditional in a very day or 2. As a result of this, it is not useful once a attention supplier is attempting to work out if your recent pain was an attack. Myoglobin. This is often a tiny low macromolecule that stores element. It’s measured often. Hemoprotein is typically measured additionally to troponin to assist diagnose an attack. It’s conjointly not terribly specific for locating an attack [1-5].

References

  1. Pieper, Rembert, Christine L Gatlin and Anthony J Makusky, et al. "The human serum proteome: Display of nearly 3700 chromatographically separated protein spots on two‐dimensional electrophoresis gels and identification of 325 distinct proteins." PROTEOMICS: International Edition 3 (2003): 1345-1364.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Marshall, John, Andy Jankowski and Shirley Furesz, et al. "Human serum proteins preseparated by electrophoresis or chromatography followed by tandem mass spectrometry." J Proteome Res 3 (2004): 364-382.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Anderson, Leigh and Norman G Anderson. "High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of human plasma proteins." Proc. Natl Acad Sci 74 (1977): 5421-5425.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Steel, Laura F, Michael G Trotter and Pamela B Nakajima, et al. "Efficient and specific removal of albumin from human serum samples." Mol Cell Proteom 2 (2003): 262-270.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Richter, Rudolf, Peter Schulz Knappe and Michael Schrader, et al. "Composition of the peptide fraction in human blood plasma: database of circulating human peptides." J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl 726 (1999): 25-35.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2054

Journal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis received 2054 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward