Sergio Navarro^*
*Correspondence: Sergio Navarro, Department of Structural Engineering, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain, Email:

Introduction

The evolution of structural design in reinforced concrete has long been guided by a deeper understanding of how buildings fail under extreme conditions. One of the significant developments in this field during the mid-20th century was the introduction of multi-stage failure analysis, which proposed that concrete frames could be intentionally designed to undergo predictable, sequential failure modes typically starting with ductile flexural failure before reaching brittle collapse mechanisms. Herbert A. Sawyerâ??s 1965 contribution, â??Design of Concrete Frames for Two Failure Stages,â? marked a pivotal point in this paradigm shift. His work emphasized the importance of recognizing and planning for two distinct phases of structural deterioration: an initial, controlled phase characterized by flexural yielding and plastic hinge formation, followed by a secondary, potentially catastrophic phase such as shear or anchorage failure. This dual-stage concept allowed engineers to design structures that not only avoided sudden collapse but also absorbed and dissipated energy during seismic or overload conditions, thereby enhancing safety and resilience [1].

Description

Sawyer's model of two-stage failure provided a practical framework for integrating ductility into concrete design, challenging earlier notions that viewed failure as a singular, often unpredictable event. By recognizing that reinforced concrete members could be designed to deform plastically in specific zones (such as beam-column joints or wall bases), engineers could ensure that inelastic behavior remained confined to predetermined regions. This not only delayed more severe forms of structural failure but also enabled redistribution of internal forces, thereby maintaining load-bearing capacity even as certain elements yielded. The concept mirrored the growing interest in plastic hinge theory and performance-based design that emerged during the same era. In Sawyer's view, early-stage failure (such as flexural yielding) could serve as a safety mechanism an indicator of distress before a more brittle and irreversible collapse occurred. Such an approach allowed for improved inspection, retrofitting and maintenance practices and contributed directly to the philosophy of designing for "fail-safe" behavior in civil structures.

The relevance of Sawyer's two-stage failure design concept has grown increasingly clear with advancements in seismic engineering. Earthquake-resistant design now relies heavily on the ability of structural systems to undergo controlled damage while preventing collapse. Modern design codes incorporate the same principle by specifying ductility requirements, confinement reinforcement and detailing rules that encourage the formation of plastic hinges in beams rather than columns or joints. These strategies stem from the same foundational idea: managing energy through staged failure, starting with flexible and predictable mechanisms. While contemporary tools such as nonlinear modeling and finite element analysis offer more precision, the conceptual clarity provided by early multi-stage frameworks remains integral to structural thinking. Moreover, these early insights paved the way for today's performance-based design methodologies, which evaluate how structures behave under different levels of demand, rather than simply ensuring code compliance [2].

Conclusion

Early frameworks for multi-stage failure design, particularly the contributions of Herbert A. Sawyer, laid the groundwork for modern reinforced concrete design philosophies centered on ductility and resilience. By acknowledging that structural failure can and should occur in stages, engineers developed safer, more adaptable buildings capable of withstanding extreme events. This concept not only redefined how failure is perceived in structural systems but also inspired a generation of research and practice focused on improving both performance and predictability in reinforced concrete structures. As engineering continues to evolve, the core principles behind multi-stage failure design remain essential to creating structures that are not only strong but also intelligently designed to fail safely.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Chan, W. W. L. "The ultimate strength and deformation of plastic hinges in reinforced concrete frameworks." Mag Concr Res 7 (1955): 121-132.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

2. Sawyer, Herbert A. "Design of concrete frames for two failure stages." Spec Publ 12 (1965): 405-437.

Google Scholar Indexed at