GET THE APP

Designing Human-Centered AI: A Cognitive Systems Engineering Perspective
Industrial Engineering & Management

Industrial Engineering & Management

ISSN: 2169-0316

Open Access

Commentary - (2025) Volume 14, Issue 1

Designing Human-Centered AI: A Cognitive Systems Engineering Perspective

Nathaniel Cecilia*
*Correspondence: Nathaniel Cecilia, Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF), University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Florence, Italy, Email:
Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF), University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Florence, Italy

Received: 27-Dec-2024, Manuscript No. iem-25-163047; Editor assigned: 30-Dec-2024, Pre QC No. P-163047; Reviewed: 10-Jan-2025, QC No. Q-163047; Revised: 17-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. R-163047; Published: 24-Jan-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2169- 0316.2025.14.284
Citation: Cecilia, Nathaniel. “Designing Human-Centered AI: A Cognitive Systems Engineering Perspective.” Ind Eng Manag 14 (2025): 284.
Copyright: © 2025 Cecilia N. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming industries, reshaping work and influencing human interactions in unprecedented ways. However, as AI systems grow more sophisticated, ensuring their usability, reliability and alignment with human needs becomes critical. Human-Centered AI (HCAI) is a design approach that prioritizes human cognition, decision-making and interactions in AI system development. By incorporating principles from Cognitive Systems Engineering (CSE), HCAI seeks to optimize AIâ??s effectiveness while ensuring safety, trust and ethical considerations. Cognitive Systems Engineering provides a framework for designing AI that seamlessly integrates with human cognitive abilities. AI should act as an effective collaborator rather than a replacement for human expertise. Understanding human cognitive limitations, biases and problem-solving strategies enables AI developers to create systems that complement and enhance human capabilities [1].

A primary goal is to develop AI that supports rather than overrides human judgment, ensuring that decision-making remains transparent, explainable and controllable. One key aspect of designing HCAI is usability. AI systems must be designed with intuitive interfaces that allow users to interact with them effectively. Poorly designed interfaces can lead to cognitive overload, errors and frustration. Cognitive Systems Engineering emphasizes the importance of cognitive workload management, ensuring that AI systems reduce complexity rather than increase it [2]. This is particularly critical in high-stakes environments such as healthcare, aviation and cybersecurity, where errors can have severe consequences. Another fundamental principle in Human-Centered AI is adaptability. AI should be capable of adjusting to human expertise levels, preferences and contextual needs.

Rather than imposing rigid structures, AI must dynamically support decision-making by offering recommendations, highlighting critical information and adapting to evolving user goals. Cognitive Systems Engineering principles help in designing AI that understands and responds to situational changes, ensuring a more personalized and effective user experience [1]. Trust is a major determinant of AI adoption. Users need to have confidence that AI systems will act reliably and ethically. Cognitive Systems Engineering promotes the development of AI that fosters trust through explainability, predictability and accountability. Transparency in AI decision-making is crucial, as opaque systems may lead to skepticism, misuse, or rejection. Designing AI with mechanisms that allow users to interrogate system decisions, understand underlying logic and intervene when necessary is vital for trust-building.

Description

Ethical considerations are also central to Human-Centered AI. AI systems must be designed to align with human values, avoiding biases that could lead to unfair or discriminatory outcomes. Cognitive Systems Engineering supports a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating insights from psychology, sociology and ethics to create AI that is both technically sound and socially responsible. Ethical AI design ensures fairness, privacy protection and respect for human autonomy. The integration of AI into workplaces and daily life requires continuous feedback loops. AI should not be a static system but an evolving one that learns from user interactions and adapts over time. Human-in-the-loop (HITL) systems allow AI to refine its performance based on real-world inputs while keeping humans in control. Cognitive Systems Engineering provides methodologies for iterative testing, user feedback incorporation and system refinement to optimize human-AI collaboration [1].

Human-Centered AI must also address the challenge of automation bias. Over-reliance on AI recommendations can lead to errors when users unquestioningly accept AI outputs without critical evaluation. Cognitive Systems Engineering encourages the design of AI that provides not only answers but also justifications, alternative options and uncertainty estimates. This ensures that human operators maintain situational awareness and make informed decisions rather than blindly trusting AI. As AI continues to advance, designing systems that respect and enhance human cognitive abilities will determine the success and acceptance of AI technologies. Human-Centered AI, guided by the principles of Cognitive Systems Engineering, promotes a future where AI serves as a valuable partner rather than a black-box decision-maker. Prioritizing usability, adaptability, trust, ethics and continuous learning will enable AI to positively impact society while keeping humans at the core of decision-making processes. By embedding these principles into AI development, we can create intelligent systems that are not only powerful but also responsible and aligned with human needs [2].

Conclusion

Designing human-centered AI from a Cognitive Systems Engineering (CSE) perspective requires a deep understanding of how humans interact with technology, make decisions and process information in complex environments. By integrating principles of CSE, AI systems can be designed to enhance human cognition, improve decision-making and foster meaningful collaboration between humans and machines. A key takeaway is that AI should be developed not as a replacement for human expertise but as a complement that augments human capabilities. This necessitates designing interfaces that align with human cognitive strengths, ensuring transparency and interpretability in AI decision-making and prioritizing ethical considerations to build trust and accountability. Future advancements in human-centered AI will depend on interdisciplinary collaboration, continuous user feedback and adaptive system designs that evolve with changing user needs and contexts. By embracing a cognitive systems engineering approach, AI can become more intuitive, resilient and aligned with human values, ultimately leading to more effective and responsible AI-driven solutions.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Wu, Dong, Yachao Chen, Sukriti Manna and Kevin Talley, et al. "Characterization of elastic modulus across the (al 1–x sc x) n system using DFT and substrate-effect-corrected nanoindentation." IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control65 (2018): 2167-2175.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref     Indexed at

  1. Uddin, Shahadat, Ibtisham Haque, Haohui Lu and Mohammad Ali Moni, et al. "Comparative performance analysis of K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) algorithm and its different variants for disease prediction." Sci Rep 12 (2022): 6256.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref     Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 739

Industrial Engineering & Management received 739 citations as per Google Scholar report

Industrial Engineering & Management peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward