GET THE APP

Depression, Anxiety and Quality of Life among Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia
..

Cancer Science & Therapy

ISSN: 1948-5956

Open Access

Research Article - (2020) Volume 12, Issue 5

Depression, Anxiety and Quality of Life among Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia

Nouf Almutairi1*, Maryam Alharbi2, Baraa M. Hammoudi3 and Othman Almutairi4
*Correspondence: Nouf Almutairi, Department of Oncology and Liver Diseases, King Faisal Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, KSA, Tel: 0096533102756, Email:
1Department of Oncology and Liver Diseases, King Faisal Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, KSA
2Oncology and Haematology Center, King Fahad Medical City, National Guard Hospital Oncology, Riyadh, KSA
3Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, KSA
4National Neuroscience Institute, King Fahad Medical city, Riyadh, KSA

Received: 02-Apr-2020 Published: 20-May-2020 , DOI: 10.37421/1948-5956.2020.12.342
Citation: Nouf Almutairi, Maryam Alharbi, Baraa M. Hammoudi and Othman Almutairi. Depression, Anxiety and Quality of Life among Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia. J Cancer Sci Ther. 12 (2020). DOI: 10.37421/jcst.2020.12.1
Copyright: © 2020 Almutairi N. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer patients have higher incidence of anxiety and depression which have a negative impact on the quality of their life independently and dependently from cancer. This Study was conducted to assess the relationship of anxiety, depression and quality of life among cancer patients in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted on cancer patients who underwent routine Outpatient health-care services in a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Results: In this study 393 cancer patients were included. Majority of them were females, married, aged between 40-60 years old. In 31% of patients had breast cancer and the 2nd most prevalent cancer was lymphoma (7.3%). Majority of patients had neither depression nor anxiety with the following rates respectively [71.1%, 86.1%]. The assessed quality of life components showed the following ; (51%) had a low quality of life, (56.7%) had a low independent lifestyle, (60.5%) low psychological coping, (52%) had high pain occurrence, (64.8%) had a good relationship, (86.1%) good senses and (57%) had good mental health. Anxiety and depression [AD] score was found to be statistically significant in 32.4% of patients in the following components ; Age less than 30 years old, having lymphoma or ovarian cancer, being divorced, having a bachelor degree or no education at all and the need of a caregiver.

Conclusion: The prevalence of low QOL (Quality of Life) is high among Saudi Cancer patient and the coexistence of anxiety occurred only in one third of all patients. Anxiety and depression appear to be not contributing to the low quality of life in cancer patients except in certain subgroups in which psychological interventions shall improve the quality of their lives.

Keywords

Depression • Anxiety • Radiotherapy • QOL: Quality of Life

Introduction

Cancer is considered a worldwide health problem in the public [1-3]. WHO definition of health emphasizes health is not a state of disease-free living but a complete mental, physical and social wellbeing [4-9]. Quality of life (QOL) is a reflection of the patient’s own psychological, physical, social and cognitive well-being [8]. Mental health disorders exist in one-third of all cancer patients mandating psychological assessment and treatment [3]. Anxiety and depression are reported as a common psychological distress in cancer patients secondary to surgical interventions, long-term intensive therapies such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy [4,5]. It was found that anxiety, depression and QOL are affected by the patient’s demographics and socio-economical status such as age, social support and financial status [10-13].

Side effects from cancer treatment are considered as an important factor that affect the patient’s QOL [14]. Many Studies have highlighted that cancer diagnosis, treatment and psycho-physical symptoms affects the patient’s QOL negatively and hinders treatment’s adaptation [15,16] . Another study found that the duration of the disease increased the duration of anxiety and depression which leads to a lower QOL [17]. Families of cancer patients face several challenges in during the patient’s medical journey and it affects their QOL significantly [6,7]. Psychological well-being and QOL are considered among the predictors of patient’s survival [11].

Contemporary advances in Cancer therapies have improved the survival rate in patients and the importance of improving the QOL and psychological support is considered an essential part of the treatment [13]. Factors that affected the QOL in cancer patients have been the attention of several researchers internationally to improve the patient’s life [12].

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study on cancer patients receiving routine outpatient health care services in the comprehensive cancer center in King Fahad Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Written consent after explaining the study and the participant’s role was obtained. We collected data on patient’s demographics [Sex, Age, Marital Status, and Degree of education] and cancer origin [Breast, Lymphoma, Ovarian, colorectal and others]. The utilized questionnaires were the internationally known Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) and Assessment of quality of life (AQOL-6D) with some add on questions.

After confidentiality assurance to all study participants statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 22. Statistical parameters such as chisquare were used for subgroup analysis and a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In this study we included three hundred ninety-three cancer patients. About 50% of patients aged between 41-60 years old. Females accounted for about 70% of all participants. Among participants 70% of them were married. The most common type of cancer was breast cancer which was evidenced in 25% of all patients. In our study 57% of all subjects declared a need for a caregiver from a family member or a health care provider (Table 1).

Table 1: Patient’s demographics.

 (n=395)
Age
<30 55 (13.9)
31-40 52 (13.2)
41-50 87 (22)
51-60 108 (27.3)
61-70 66 (16.7)
71+ 27 (6.8)
Diagnosis
Lung CA 15 (3.8%)
Breast CA 102 (25.95%)
Colorectal CA 36 (9.1%)
Leukaemia 30 (7.6%)
Lymphoma 45 (11.45%)
Colon CA 16 (4%)
Pancreas 11 (2.79%)
Brain 17 (4.32%)
Cervical 21 (5.34%)
Thyroid 12 (3.05%)
Others 88 (22.39)
Gender
Male 122 (30.9)
Female 273 (69.1)
Marital Status
Single 65 (16.5)
Married 277 (70.1)
Divorced 17 (4.3)
Widow 36 (9.1)
Education
Not educated 98 (24.8)
Primary 90 (22.8)
High school 104 (26.3)
Bachelor’s degree 103 (26.1)
Caregiver
I need a caregiver from a family or health care provider. 227 (57.5)
I don’t need a caregiver. 168 (42.5)

Assessment of quality of life questionnaire showed that more than half of cancer patients had low independent lifestyle (56.7%), low coping (60.5%), high pain (52.9%) and low quality of life (51.1%). However, the majority of participants had a good relationship (64.8%), good senses (86.1%), and good mental health (57%) (Table 2).

Table 2: Components assessed in the quality of life questionnaire (ADQL-6D).

Independent lifestyle
High 171 (43.3)
Low 224 (56.7)
Relationship
Good 256 (64.8)
Bad 139 (35.2)
Mental health
Good 225 (57)
Bad 170 (43)
Coping
High 156 (39.5)
Low 239 (60.5)
Pain
Low 186 (47.1)
High 209 (52.9)
Senses
Good 340 (86.1)
Bad 55 (13.9)
AQ
High 193 (48.9)
Low 202 (51.1)

The questionnaire utilizing HADS illustrated that the majority of patients (86.3%) were anxiety free and depression didn’t exist in (71%) of all study participants. More than half of the patients had a low independent lifestyle (56.7%), low psychological coping (60.5%), high frequency of pain (52.9%) and low quality of life (51.1%). On the other hand more than half of the subjects have shown good social relationship status (64.8%), had good senses (86.1%) and good mental health (57%). The overall anxiety-depression score was positive in 32% of all cancer patients (Table 3).

Table 3: Assessed components in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Anxiety
11-21 = Abnormal (case) 54 (13.7)
8-10 = Borderline 64 (16.2)
0-7 = Normal 277 (70.1)
Anxiety
+VE 54 (13.7)
-VE 341 (86.3)
Depression
11-21 = Abnormal (case) 114 (28.9)
8-10 = Borderline 100 (25.3)
0-7 = Normal 181 (45.8)
Depression
+VE 114 (28.9)
-VE 281 (71.1)
AD score
+VE 128 (32.4)
-VE 267 (67.6)
Independent lifestyle
High 171 (43.3)
Low 224 (56.7)
Relationship
Good 256 (64.8)
Bad 139 (35.2)
Mental health
Good 225 (57)
Bad 170 (43)
Coping
High 156 (39.5)
Low 239 (60.5)
Pain
Low 186 (47.1)
High 209 (52.9)
Senses
Good 340 (86.1)
Bad 55 (13.9)
AQ
High 193 (48.9)
Low 202 (51.1)

In another statistically significant correlative analysis of patients factors and the co-existence of anxiety and depression have showed that the following patient factors are implicated such as; age of less than 30 years old are more affected [0.034], having lymphoma or ovarian cancer [0.021 and 0.039], being divorced [0.004], having no education or a bachelor degree [0.000 and 0.002], having a need for a caregiver [0.000] (Table 4).

Table 4: Anxiety and depression associated patient’s factor.

Variables +VE (n=128) -VE (n=267) P Value*
Age
<30 11 (8.6) 44 (16.5) 0.034
31-40 12 (9.4) 40 (15) 0.123
41-50 34 (26.6) 53 (19.9) 0.132
51-60 40 (31.3) 68 (25.5) 0.228
61-70 22 (17.2) 44 (16.5) 0.860
71+ 9 (7) 18 (6.7) 0.915
DX
Breast cancer 32 (25) 67 (25.1) 0.984
Lymphoma 5 (3.9) 29 (10.9) 0.021
Colorectal cancer 8 (6.3) 26 (9.7) 0.247
Leukaemia 2 (1.6) 10 (3.7) 0.352
Lung cancer 1 (0.8) 7 (2.6) 0.446
Ovarian cancer 5 (3.9) 2 (0.7) 0.039
B cell lymphoma 2 (1.6) 4 (1.5) 1.000
Osteosarcoma 1 (0.8) 3 (1.1) 1.000
Prostate cancer 0 (0) 1 (0.4) 1.000
Others 72 (56.3) 118 (44.2) 0.025
Gender
Male 35 (27.3) 87 (32.6) 0.291
Female 93 (72.7) 180 (67.4)  
Marital
Single 17 (13.3) 48 (18) 0.239
Married 86 (67.2) 191 (71.5) 0.377
Divorced 11 (8.6) 6 (2.2) 0.004
Widow 14 (10.9) 22 (8.2) 0.383
Education
Not educated 46 (35.9) 52 (19.5) 0.000
Primary 33 (25.8) 57 (21.3) 0.326
High school 28 (21.9) 76 (28.5) 0.164
Bachelor’s degree 21 (16.4) 82 (30.7) 0.002
Caregiver
I need a caregiver 100 (78.1) 127 (47.6) 0.000
I don’t need a caregiver 28 (21.9) 140 (52.4)
AQ
High 12 (9.4) 181 (67.8) 0.000
Low 116 (90.6) 86 (32.2)

A correlative analysis of the patients demographics and the quality of life have showed a statistical significance in patients with the following factors; age between 61-70 [0.006] or younger than 30 years old [0.008], being single [0.005] or divorced [0.008], having no education [0.005] or a bachelor degree [0.008] and the need for a caregiver [0.000] (Table 5).

Table 5: Quality of life associated patient factors.

  High (n=193) Low (n=202) P value*
Age
<30 36 (18.7) 19 (9.4) 0.008
31-40 30 (15.5) 22 (10.9) 0.172
41-50 45 (23.3) 42 (20.8) 0.545
51-60 51 (26.4) 57 (28.2) 0.689
61-70 22 (11.4) 44 (21.8) 0.006
71+ 9 (4.7) 18 (8.9) 0.094
DX
Breast cancer 51 (26.4) 48 (23.8) 0.542
Lymphoma 20 (10.4) 14 (6.9) 0.224
Colorectal cancer 18 (9.3) 16 (7.9) 0.619
Leukemia 9 (4.7) 3 (1.5) 0.066
Lung cancer 5 (2.6) 3 (1.5) 0.495
Ovarian cancer 2 (1) 5 (2.5) 0.450
B cell lymphoma 2 (1) 4 (2) 0.686
Osteosarcoma 3 (1.6) 1 (0.5) 0.362
Prostate cancer 1 (0.5) 0 (0) 0.489
Others 82 (42.5) 108 (53.5) 0.029
Gender
Male 68 (35.2) 54 (26.7) 0.068
Female 125 (64.8) 148 (73.3)
Marital
Single 42 (21.8) 23 (11.4) 0.005
Married 134 (69.4) 143 (70.8) 0.826
Divorced 3 (1.6) 14 (6.9) 0.008
Widow 14 (7.3) 22 (10.9) 0.209
Education
Not educated 27 (14) 71 (35.1) 0.000
Primary 37 (19.2) 53 (26.2) 0.094
High school 57 (29.5) 47 (23.3) 0.158
Bachelor’s degree 72 (37.3) 31 (15.3) 0.000
Caregiver
I need a caregiver 70 (36.3) 157 (77.7) 0.000
I don’t need a caregiver. 123 (63.7) 45 (22.3)

Discussion

In the current literature no studies have been done in the Arabic world on the quality of life and the coexistence of anxiety and depression among cancer patients hence this study is considered the 1st to the best of our knowledge. Our study showed that the rate of anxiety (13.7%) and depression (29%) among cancer patients is lower than the published rates by Ahmed et al. [18] which illustrated a prevalence of subjective depression (44.8%), anxiety (52.5%) and stress (42.7%) in cancer patients. The reported rates may vary as there are no baseline rates for anxiety and depression in Saudi Arabia for cancer patients in general.

A study on radiotherapy cancer receiving patients in Saudi Arabia by Almigbal et al. [19] demonstrated a high rate of Anxiety (66%) and depression (67%) as compared to our rates in their psych-oncology screening tool on 148 patients. A comparative study was conducted in Germany by Frick et al. [20] which showed that radiotherapy receiving patients had a rate of 9.5% for anxiety and/ or depression in their HADS score on 63 patients.

As a known fact that breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women according to WHO; to which 25% of our subjects had breast cancer. A study was done on breast cancer affected subjects in Levant (Syria, Lebanon, Palestine) showed a lower prevalence of Anxiety (41%) and depression (24%) similar to our all over rate of anxiety and depression. An observational study on breast cancer patients over 5 years by Giese-Davis et al. [21] showed that about 50% of breast cancer affected patients had anxiety and depression in the 1st year and the rate dropped to 15% in 5th year while 45% of patients have anxiety or/and depression within 3 months from diagnosis. Another study by Zaben et al. [22] that assessed anxiety and marital quality in breast cancer Saudi patients showed that only 10% of patients had anxiety and 15% of subjects had a probable anxiety disorder with no significant relationship between marriage quality and breast cancer but they had only 49 patients in their study.

Colorectal cancer is considered one of the most common cancers in men and women worldwide and around 9% of our patients had colorectal cancer. A systematic review was conducted by Peng et al. [23] which included 15 articles from 1967 to 2018 and it showed a prevalence for depression (1.6%-57%) and anxiety (1%-47%) in the studied population (93,805); an interesting conclusion from this review is the lower reported rates of anxiety and depression in the studies that have utilized a psychiatrist to administer the standardized diagnostic assessment as compared to the research assistant administrator utilizing the same surveys.

The sub-grouping assessment of different age groups in our study demonstrated a statistically significant correlation in patients under the age of 30 years old with anxiety and depression. A study on Saudi cancer patients by Almigbal et al. [19] showed that age is a significant predictor of psychological distress. On the other hand, our study showed a low quality of life in patients older than 61 years old with cancer.

A systematic review by Peng et al. [23] on CRC patients showed that the included studies found that depression rate is higher in older and young patients; anxiety was found to be higher in elderly patients with one study showing no correlation of Anxiety and depression with age.

The analysis of the marital status of the patients showed that, divorced subjects showed the highest rate of anxiety and depression and a lower quality of life when compared to the other marital based subgroups. In two studies by Ahmed et al. [18] and Al-Zaben et al. [22] showed no correlation between marital status and anxiety and depression.

In our study, patients with no education showed higher rates of anxiety and depression and lower quality of life when compared to other educational subgroups. While patients with a bachelor degree are showing a lower rate for anxiety, depression and higher quality of life as compared to other subgroups. In contradiction to our conclusion a study by Ahmed et al. [18] on Saudi patients which showed that high level of formal education increases the psychological symptoms.

The site of cancer didn’t affect the prevalence of anxiety, depression or the quality of life in our study. A study by Almigbal et al. [19] on Saudi patients showed that breast cancer patients are more depressed than colorectal cancer patients. Another study by Abulkhair et al. [24] that was conducted in USA showed that patients with lung, gynaecological and haematological cancer have a higher rate of depression and distress while another review by Silva et al. [25] have shown a non-significant association between cancer type and psychological disorders.

The coexistence of depression and/or anxiety has a substantial impact on the patient’s quality of life and overall prognosis. A meta-analysis by Ferlay et al. [26] showed that depression predicted mortality with a 26% mortality rate with depressive symptoms and 39% mortality rate in patients with major depression. Another review by Astin et al. [27] showed that patients with depression have a higher mortality rate by 25% when compared to non-depressed subjects.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this presented study have a substantial impact because in Saudi Arabia we don’t have enough published papers on quality of life, anxiety or depression in cancer patients and this study will guide future researchers to execute prospective studies in order to improve the overall prognosis of patients and their quality of life. On the other hand, our study have the following limitations ; our study lacked the timing of diagnosis as mentioned above where the rate of anxiety and depression have decreased overtime in diseased patients, in our survey a researcher conducted the interview and not a psychiatrist which might have exaggerated the rates of anxiety and depression, the inherited limitation of cross sectional studies where association can be proved and causation can be detailed and lastly the generalizability of the HADS and ADQL international questionnaire on the Saudi population and the lack of such questionnaire from the Saudi ministry of health might have decreased the specificity of our survey.

References

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 3968

Cancer Science & Therapy received 3968 citations as per Google Scholar report

Cancer Science & Therapy peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward