GET THE APP

Breaking Barriers in Surgery: Women and Minorities in the Field
..

Journal of Surgery

ISSN: [Jurnalul de chirurgie]
ISSN: 1584-9341

Open Access

Commentary - (2023) Volume 19, Issue 1

Breaking Barriers in Surgery: Women and Minorities in the Field

Ethan Singh*
*Correspondence: Ethan Singh, Department of Surgery, University of Opelika, 301 Lake Condy Rd, Opelika, AL 36801, USA, Email:
Department of Surgery, University of Opelika, 301 Lake Condy Rd, Opelika, AL 36801, USA

Received: 02-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. JOS-23-96886; Editor assigned: 04-Jan-2023, Pre QC No. P-96886; Reviewed: 17-Jan-2023, QC No. Q-96886; Revised: 23-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. R-96886; Published: 31-Jan-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/1584-9341.2023.19.76
Citation: Singh, Ethan. “Breaking Barriers in Surgery: Women and Minorities in the Field.” J Surg 19 (2023): 76.
Copyright: © 2023 Singh E. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Description

Surgery has been a male-dominated field for a long time. But in recent years, there have been a growing number of women and minorities entering the field, breaking barriers and changing the face of surgery. Despite the progress made, there are still many obstacles that women and minorities face in the field of surgery. These obstacles include gender and racial bias, lack of representation, and unequal access to opportunities. One of the biggest barriers that women and minorities face in surgery is the perception that they are not as capable as their male counterparts. This perception is often fueled by stereotypes and biases that persist in the field. For example, women may be seen as too emotional or not aggressive enough to succeed in surgery, while minorities may be seen as lacking the necessary cultural competency to work effectively with patients [1].

These biases can have a real impact on women and minorities in surgery. Studies have shown that women and minorities are less likely to be chosen for leadership roles, receive promotions, or be recognized for their achievements. They may also face discrimination in the workplace, such as being paid less than their male colleagues or being excluded from important conversations or decision-making processes. Another barrier that women and minorities face in surgery is the lack of representation in the field. While there has been progress in recent years, with more women and minorities entering the field, they still make up a small percentage of surgeons overall. This lack of representation can make it difficult for women and minorities to find mentors and role models in the field, and can also contribute to feelings of isolation and exclusion.

In addition to these barriers, women and minorities in surgery also face unequal access to opportunities. For example, they may be less likely to have access to high-profile surgeries or research opportunities, or may be overlooked for speaking engagements or other professional development opportunities. Despite these challenges, there are many women and minorities who are breaking barriers and making important contributions to the field of surgery. For example, Dr. Susan Lim, a surgeon from Singapore, was the first woman to perform a liver transplant. A transplant surgeon at the University of California, San Francisco, was the first woman to perform a liver transplant. There are also many organizations and initiatives that are working to support women and minorities in surgery. For example, the Association of Women Surgeons is a professional organization that supports women surgeons through networking, mentoring, and professional development opportunities. The Society of Black Academic Surgeons is another organization that supports Black surgeons through mentoring, advocacy, and community-building initiatives.

There are also many steps that individual surgeons and institutions can take to support women and minorities in surgery. For example, they can work to increase diversity and representation in leadership positions, provide mentorship and support for women and minority surgeons, and address biases and discrimination in the workplace. In women and minorities are breaking barriers in the field of surgery, but there is still much work to be done. We must continue to address the biases and barriers that exist in the field, and work to create a more equitable and inclusive environment for all surgeons. By doing so, we can ensure that the best and brightest minds are able to contribute to the field of surgery, regardless of their gender, race, or background [2].

One important aspect of addressing the barriers that women and minorities face in surgery is to promote diversity and inclusion in the field. This can involve recruiting and retaining women and minorities in surgery, and providing them with the necessary support and resources to succeed. One approach that has been successful in promoting diversity in surgery is the use of mentorship programs. Mentorship can provide women and minorities with guidance, support, and professional development opportunities that may not be available otherwise. Additionally, mentorship can help to create a more inclusive environment in which women and minorities feel supported and valued. Another important step in promoting diversity and inclusion in surgery is to address the biases and stereotypes that exist in the field. This can involve training programs that help to raise awareness of unconscious biases, and promote more equitable hiring and promotion practices. It can also involve creating a more inclusive culture within surgical departments, where all individuals are valued for their unique perspectives and experiences.

Finally, it is important to address the systemic barriers that exist in surgery, such as the lack of access to opportunities and resources for women and minorities. This can involve advocating for policies that promote diversity and inclusion, and providing funding and resources to support underrepresented groups. In summary, there is a growing recognition of the need to promote diversity and inclusion in the field of surgery. While progress has been made in recent years, there are still significant barriers that women and minorities face. By promoting diversity, addressing biases, and providing support and resources, we can create a more inclusive environment in which all individuals are able to succeed in surgery. This will not only benefit women and minorities, but also the field of surgery as a whole, by ensuring that the best and brightest minds are able to contribute to this important and evolving field.

It is important to note that promoting diversity and inclusion in surgery is not just a matter of fairness or social justice, but also has practical implications for patient care and outcomes. Research has shown that diverse teams are better able to identify and address patient needs, and are more innovative and effective in problem-solving. Additionally, patients from underrepresented groups may feel more comfortable and better understood by a diverse medical team. In addition to promoting diversity and inclusion in the field, it is also important to recognize and celebrate the contributions of women and minorities in surgery [3,4].

This can involve highlighting their achievements and successes, and providing them with opportunities to share their knowledge and expertise. It can also involve promoting a more diverse range of role models and leaders in surgery, to inspire the next generation of surgeons. Overall, breaking barriers in surgery requires a multifaceted approach that involves promoting diversity, addressing biases, providing support and resources, and celebrating the contributions of women and minorities in the field. By working together, we can create a more inclusive and equitable environment in which all individuals are able to succeed and make important contributions to the field of surgery [5].

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Carroll, Annemaree, Stephen Houghton, Robert Wood and Kerrie Unsworth, et al. "Self-efficacy and academic achievement in Australian high school students: The mediating effects of academic aspirations and delinquency."J Adolesc 32 (2009): 797-817.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Wanberg, Connie R, Borbala Csillag, Richard P. Douglass and Le Zhou, et al. "Socioeconomic status and well-being during COVID-19: A resource-based examination."J Appl Soc Psychol 105 (2020): 1382.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Durlak, Joseph A, Roger P. Weissberg, Allison B. Dymnicki and Rebecca D. Taylor, et al. "The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions." Child Dev82 (2011): 405-432.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Judge, Timothy A, Christine L. Jackson, John C. Shaw and Brent A. Scott, et al. "Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences."J Appl Soc Psychol 92 (2007): 107.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Shoji, Kotaro, Roman Cieslak, Ewelina Smoktunowicz and Anna Rogala, et al. "Associations between job burnout and self-efficacy: A meta-analysis."Anxiety Stress Coping 29 (2016): 367-386.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 288

Journal of Surgery received 288 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Surgery peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward