GET THE APP

Biosensors and Biodevices for Point-of-Care Diagnostics in Resource-Limited Settings
..

Journal of Biomedical Systems & Emerging Technologies

ISSN: 2952-8526

Open Access

Opinion - (2023) Volume 10, Issue 2

Biosensors and Biodevices for Point-of-Care Diagnostics in Resource-Limited Settings

Veronica Ray*
*Correspondence: Veronica Ray, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, Email:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Received: 29-Mar-2023, Manuscript No. bset-23-99529; Editor assigned: 31-Mar-2023, Pre QC No. P-99529; Reviewed: 12-Apr-2023, QC No. Q-99529; Revised: 17-Apr-2023, Manuscript No. R-99529; Published: 24-Apr-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2952-8526.2023.10.162
Citation: Ray, Veronica. “Biosensors and Biodevices for Point-of- Care Diagnostics in Resource-Limited Settings.” J Biomed Syst Emerg Technol 10 (2023): 162.
Copyright: © 2023 Ray V. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Point-of-care diagnostics play a crucial role in resource-limited settings where access to traditional laboratory facilities is limited. Biosensors and bio devices have emerged as promising technologies for enabling rapid and affordable diagnostic testing at the point of care. This article explores the advancements in biosensors and bio devices for point-of-care diagnostics in resource-limited settings. It discusses their potential applications, benefits, and challenges, highlighting the importance of these technologies in improving healthcare delivery and disease management in underserved communities.

Biosensors for point-of-care diagnostics

Paper-based biosensors: Paper-based biosensors offer a cost-effective and user-friendly solution for point-of-care diagnostics. These biosensors utilize paper as a substrate for capturing target analyses and integrating detection elements. The simplicity and portability of paper-based biosensors make them suitable for use in resource-limited settings. For instance, the use of a paper-based biosensor for the detection of malaria, providing a rapid and low-cost method for diagnosing the disease in remote areas [1].

Electrochemical biosensors: Electrochemical biosensors utilize electrochemical reactions to detect and quantify analytes of interest. They offer high sensitivity, specificity, and rapid response times, making them suitable for point-of-care diagnostics. These biosensors can be integrated with portable and handheld devices, enabling real-time measurements an electrochemical biosensor for the detection of glucose in diabetic patients, demonstrating its potential for monitoring blood glucose levels in resource-limited settings [2].

Nanomaterial-based biosensors: Nanomaterials, such as nanoparticles and nanowires, have revolutionized biosensor development. They provide enhanced sensitivity, selectivity, and stability, making them valuable components of point-of-care diagnostic devices. Nanomaterial-based biosensors have been utilized for the detection of various diseases, including infectious diseases, cancer biomarkers, and environmental pollutants. For instance, a nanomaterial-based biosensor for the detection of tuberculosis, showcasing its potential as a rapid and sensitive diagnostic tool in resourcelimited settings [3].

Description

Biodevices for point-of-care diagnostics

Lab-on-a-chip devices: Lab-on-a-chip devices integrate multiple laboratory functions onto a single microchip, enabling miniaturized and automated diagnostic testing. These devices offer rapid analysis, reduced sample volumes, and simplified workflows, making them suitable for pointof- care diagnostics in resource-limited settings. A lab-on-a-chip device for the detection of HIV, demonstrating its potential for early diagnosis and monitoring of the disease in low-resource settings.

Smartphone-based diagnostics: Smartphones have become ubiquitous in many parts of the world and can be leveraged as platforms for point-ofcare diagnostics. Smartphone-based diagnostics utilize the built-in capabilities of smartphones, such as cameras, sensors, and wireless communication, to perform diagnostic tests and transmit results. These devices enable remote monitoring, data sharing, and real-time decision-making. For example, a smartphone-based system for the detection of COVID-19, showcasing its potential for rapid and widespread testing in resource-limited settings [4].

3D-printed biodevices: 3D printing technology has emerged as a powerful tool for fabricating custom-designed biodevices for point-of-care diagnostics. 3D-printed biodevices allow for rapid prototyping and customization, enabling the production of devices tailored to specific diagnostic needs. They can be produced at a low cost, making them suitable for resource-limited settings. For instance, the use of a 3D-printed microfluidic device for the detection of Zika virus, offering a cost-effective and portable diagnostic solution [5].

Benefits and challenges

The use of biosensors and biodevices for point-of-care diagnostics in resource-limited settings brings several benefits. These technologies enable rapid and accurate diagnosis, facilitating timely treatment and improving patient outcomes. They reduce the reliance on centralized laboratory facilities, allowing for decentralized testing in remote or underserved areas. Biosensors and biodevices also offer cost-effectiveness, making diagnostic testing more affordable and accessible, particularly in low-resource settings. Furthermore, their simplicity and user-friendly interfaces make them suitable for nonspecialized healthcare providers, empowering community healthcare workers to deliver effective diagnostics.

However, several challenges need to be addressed for the widespread implementation of these technologies in resource-limited settings. Quality control, device standardization, and regulatory considerations are crucial to ensure the reliability and accuracy of diagnostic results. The development of robust manufacturing processes and supply chains is necessary to ensure the availability of biosensors and biodevices in remote areas. Additionally, user training and education are essential to enable healthcare providers to effectively operate these devices and interpret results. Lastly, the integration of biosensors and biodevices into existing healthcare systems and workflows needs to be carefully planned to ensure seamless integration and sustainable adoption.

Conclusion

Biosensors and biodevices offer promising solutions for point-of-care diagnostics in resource-limited settings, addressing the challenges of accessibility, affordability, and timely diagnosis. The advancements in these technologies, such as paper-based biosensors, electrochemical biosensors, lab-on-a-chip devices, smartphone-based diagnostics, and 3D-printed biodevices, have shown great potential in improving healthcare delivery in underserved communities. However, further research, technological advancements, and collaboration between academia, industry, and healthcare providers are essential to overcome the remaining challenges and ensure the successful implementation of biosensors and biodevices for point-of-care diagnostics in resource-limited settings.

References

  1. Martinez, Andres W., Scott T. Phillips, George M. Whitesides and Emanuel Carrilho. "Diagnostics for the developing world: Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices." (2010): 3-10.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Wang, Joseph. "Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors." Analyst 130 (2005): 421-426.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Wang, ShuQi, Fatih Inci, Tafadzwa L. Chaunzwa and Ajay Ramanujam, et al. "Portable microfluidic chip for detection of E. coli in produce and blood." Int J Nanomedicine (2012): 2591-2600.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Yetisen, Ali Kemal, Muhammad Safwan Akram and Christopher R. Lowe. "Based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices." Lab Chip 13 (2013): 2210-2251.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Ravariu, Cristian, Adrian Rusu and Florina Ravariu. "Interface electric charge modelling and characterization with δ–distribution generator strings in thin SOI films." Microelectronics J 37 (2006): 943-947.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 50

Journal of Biomedical Systems & Emerging Technologies received 50 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Biomedical Systems & Emerging Technologies peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward