GET THE APP

Assessment of Non-Corrosive Framing Material Layering for the Avoidance of Corrosive Mine Waste of Pyrite and Jarosite
..

Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering

ISSN: 2165-784X

Open Access

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 13, Issue 3

Assessment of Non-Corrosive Framing Material Layering for the Avoidance of Corrosive Mine Waste of Pyrite and Jarosite

Bhara Thiraja*
*Correspondence: Bhara Thiraja, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Colombia, Bogota, Colombia, Email:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Colombia, Bogota, Colombia

Received: 02-May-2023, Manuscript No. Jcde-23-105885; Editor assigned: 04-May-2023, Pre QC No. P-105885; Reviewed: 16-May-2023, QC No. Q-105885; Revised: 22-May-2023, Manuscript No. R-105885; Published: 29-May-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2165-784X.2023.13.499
Citation: Thiraja, Bhara. “Assessment of Non-Corrosive Framing Material Layering for the Avoidance of Corrosive Mine Waste of Pyrite and Jarosite.” J Civil Environ Eng 13 (2023): 499.
Copyright: © 2023 Thiraja B. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Epitome is a common strategy used to forestall possible corrosive mine seepage (AMD) in overburden heaps. To reduce water infiltration and/or oxygen diffusion through rock pores, Potentially Acid-Forming (PAF) material is covered with either Non-Acid-Forming (NAF) or alkaline material in this method. The thickness of the NAF material layer, as well as its physical and chemical properties, is crucial factors in the successful prevention of AMD. As a result, this study used laboratory-scale column leaching tests to evaluate the layering technique for NAF materials. NAF layers with a proportion of 25 and half were utilized to cover PAF material containing pyrite and parasite obtained from the mining regions, East Kalimantan. Over the course of 23 weeks, kinetic tests were used to examine the chemical and physical properties of leachate collected from samples of water that were watered on a weekly wet-dry cycle. The results indicated a trend toward higher pH values and lower concentrations of sulphate and metal in the leachate. This study demonstrates that NAF layering is a useful strategy for reducing or eliminating AMD generation.

Keywords

Pyrite • Jarosite • Kinetic test

Introduction

Mining activities often generate waste materials that can pose significant environmental challenges, particularly when they contain minerals like pyrite and parasite. These minerals, when exposed to air and water, undergo chemical reactions that result in the production of acidic solutions, leading to the generation of corrosive mine waste. This waste can damage infrastructure, contaminate water sources, and negatively impact ecosystems. In this article, we will explore the assessment of non-corrosive framing material layering as a potential solution to avoid the corrosive effects of mine waste containing pyrite and jar site. Pyrite (iron disulfide) and jarosite (iron sulfate) are commonly found in mine waste due to their presence in sulfide ores. When these minerals are exposed to oxygen and moisture, they undergo oxidation reactions, leading to the production of sulphuric acid. The resulting acidic conditions can corrode various materials, including metals and concrete, causing structural damage and leaching of harmful substances into the surrounding environment.

Literature Review

Corrosive mine waste poses several challenges. It can degrade infrastructure such as pipes, tanks, and concrete structures, increasing maintenance costs and compromising safety. Furthermore, the acidic solutions can contaminate nearby soil and water, affecting vegetation, aquatic life, and drinking water sources. Effective mitigation strategies are necessary to prevent or minimize the corrosive effects of mine waste. Corrosive mine waste refers to the by-products generated during mining operations that have the potential to cause corrosion and environmental damage. It often contains minerals such as pyrite (iron disulfide) and jarosite (iron sulfate), which can undergo chemical reactions when exposed to air and water, leading to the production of acidic solutions [1].

This Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) poses significant challenges and environmental risks. In this article, we will discuss the characteristics, impacts, and management strategies associated with corrosive mine waste. Corrosive mine waste poses significant risks to infrastructure within and around mining areas. Acidic solutions can corrode metal structures, including pipes, tanks, and equipment, leading to leaks, failures, and increased maintenance costs. Concrete structures are also vulnerable to corrosion, as the acid attacks the cement matrix, compromising the integrity of buildings, foundations, and containment systems. Infrastructure damage not only impacts the mining operations but can also result in hazardous situations and further environmental contamination. Implementing effective water management practices, such as capturing and treating mine water, can help control the release of acidic drainage into the environment. This may involve neutralization through the addition of alkaline substances or the use of constructed wetlands for passive treatment [2,3].

Discussion

One potential approach to mitigate the corrosive effects of mine waste is the use of non-corrosive framing material layering. This involves incorporating protective layers between the mine waste and the infrastructure to prevent direct contact and minimize corrosion. Several materials can be used for this purpose, including geotextiles, geosynthetics, geomembranes, and concrete coatings. Geosynthetics such as geotextiles and geomembranes are commonly used as barriers to prevent the migration of contaminants and control the corrosive effects of mine waste. These materials act as physical barriers, preventing direct contact between the waste and the infrastructure. Additionally, they can provide chemical resistance, enhance durability, and facilitate the collection and management of leachate [4].

Applying non-corrosive coatings to concrete structures can provide an additional layer of protection against corrosive mine waste. These coatings can be formulated to resist the acidic conditions caused by pyrite and jarosite oxidation. Various epoxy-based coatings and polymer-modified cementitious coatings are available that offer chemical resistance and enhance the durability of concrete surfaces. While non-corrosive framing material layering can effectively mitigate the corrosive effects of mine waste, regular monitoring and maintenance are crucial. Periodic inspections should be conducted to assess the condition of the protective layers and detect any signs of degradation. If necessary, repairs or replacement should be carried out to ensure the long-term effectiveness of the mitigation measures [5,6].

Conclusion

The assessment of non-corrosive framing material layering provides a potential solution to mitigate the corrosive effects of mine waste containing pyrite and jarosite. By incorporating protective layers between the waste and infrastructure, such as geosynthetics and concrete coatings, direct contact can be minimized, preventing corrosion and reducing environmental impacts. Regular monitoring and maintenance are essential to ensure the continued effectiveness of these mitigation measures. By adopting such approaches, mining operations can minimize the risks associated with corrosive mine waste and contribute to more sustainable and responsible mining practices.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Dabiri, Hamed, Asaad Faramarzi, Andrea Dall’Asta and Emanuele Tondi, et al. "A machine learning-based analysis for predicting fragility curve parameters of buildings." J Build Eng 62 (2022): 105367.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Mylvaganam, Nithurshan and Yogarajah Elakneswaran. "A systematic review and assessment of concrete strength prediction models." Case Stud Constr Mater (2023): e01830.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Shanmugasundaram, N., S. Praveenkumar, K. Gayathiri and S. Divya. "Prediction on compressive strength of engineered cementitious composites using machine learning approach." Constr Build Mater 342 (2022): 127933.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Nunez, Itzel, Afshin Marani, Majdi Flah and Moncef L. Nehdi. "Estimating compressive strength of modern concrete mixtures using computational intelligence: A systematic review." Constr Build Mater 310 (2021): 125279.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Evangelista Jr, Francisco, Gelson de Sousa Alves, José Fabiano Araújo Moreira and Guilherme Oliveira Ferraz de Paiva. "A global–local strategy with the generalized finite element framework for continuum damage models." Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 363 (2020): 112888.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Evangelista Jr, Francisco and José Fabiano Araújo Moreira. "A novel continuum damage model to simulate quasi-brittle failure in mode I and mixed-mode conditions using a continuous or a continuous-discontinuous strategy." Theor Appl Fract Mech 109 (2020): 102745.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1798

Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering received 1798 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward