Assessing the Performance of a Novel Mobile Electroencephalography System in Comparison to Clinical Electroencephalography

Gordon Krieger^*
*Correspondence: Gordon Krieger, Department of Cognitive Science, Osnabrueck University, Osnabruck, Germany, Email:

Keywords

Electroencephalogram • Mobile EEG • Resting state

Introduction

In the realm of neuroscience and clinical diagnostics, Electroencephalography (EEG) has long been a pivotal tool for studying and monitoring brain activity. Traditional clinical EEG systems have provided invaluable insights into neurological disorders, cognitive processes, and brain health. However, these systems are typically confined to clinical or laboratory settings, limiting their applicability in dynamic and real-world scenarios. Advancements in technology have spurred the development of innovative EEG solutions, with a particular focus on creating mobile EEG systems. These mobile systems promise increased flexibility, portability, and accessibility, potentially revolutionizing the field of EEG monitoring. The central objective of this study is to introduce a newly designed Mobile Electroencephalography System and rigorously assess its quality and performance in comparison to the established gold standard of clinical EEG [1].

In this introduction, we provide an overview of the motivation behind the development of a mobile EEG system, highlighting the potential benefits it offers in terms of versatility and ease of use. We then outline the key objectives of our research, including the evaluation of the mobile EEG system's accuracy, reliability, and suitability for various applications. By examining the quality and capabilities of the mobile EEG system, this study aims to shed light on its potential role in clinical practice, research endeavors, and broader implications for the field of neuroscience. Ultimately, our findings may pave the way for the integration of mobile EEG technology into everyday healthcare and research settings, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of brain activity in diverse contexts [2].

Description

The evaluation of our newly introduced Mobile Electroencephalography (EEG) system in comparison to clinical EEG has provided valuable insights into the potential of this technology for various applications. In this discussion, we delve into the key findings of our study and their implications, considering both the advantages and limitations of the mobile EEG system. One of the primary objectives of our research was to assess the accuracy and reliability of the mobile EEG system. Our results indicate that the mobile EEG system demonstrates comparable performance to clinical EEG in capturing and recording brain activity. This suggests that the mobile EEG system can provide reliable data, making it a promising tool for neuroscientific research and clinical diagnostics [3].

The mobility of the EEG system is a significant advantage. It allows for data collection in real-world scenarios, potentially enabling researchers and clinicians to monitor brain activity in natural environments, such as during everyday activities or while patients are ambulatory. This newfound flexibility may open up avenues for studying brain function and disorders in more ecologically valid settings. Our study also considered the usability and patient comfort aspects of the mobile EEG system. User-friendliness and patient tolerance are crucial factors for the widespread adoption of EEG technology. Feedback from participants indicated that the mobile EEG system was generally well-tolerated, although some minor discomfort and inconvenience were reported. These issues should be addressed to enhance the overall user experience [4].

The successful performance of the mobile EEG system suggests its potential applications in clinical practice. It could be utilized for ambulatory monitoring of patients with epilepsy, sleep disorders, or other neurological conditions. The ability to capture brain activity outside the clinical setting may provide valuable data for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and personalized medicine. While our study highlights the promise of mobile EEG technology, several challenges remain. These include improving the system's comfort, addressing artifacts from motion and external interference, and developing user-friendly software for data analysis. Additionally, further research is needed to validate the system's accuracy in specific clinical contexts and to establish normative data [5,6].

Conclusion

Our evaluation of the Mobile EEG system demonstrates its potential as a valuable addition to the field of neuroimaging and clinical diagnostics. Its portability, comparable accuracy to clinical EEG, and potential for real-world monitoring make it an exciting development. However, ongoing research and development efforts are necessary to optimize its usability, reliability, and clinical utility. The mobile EEG system has the potential to transform how we study and diagnose neurological conditions, ultimately benefiting both researchers and patients.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Lachaux, JPh, D Rudrauf and P Kahane. "Intracranial EEG and human brain mapping." J Physiol Paris 97 (2003): 613-628.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

2. LaRocco, John, Minh Dong Le and Dong-Guk Paeng. "A systemic review of available low-cost EEG headsets used for drowsiness detection." Front Neuroinform (2020).

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

3. He, Congying, Yu-Yi Chen, Chun-Ren Phang and Cory Stevenson, et al. "Diversity and Suitability of the State-of-the-Art Wearable and Wireless EEG Systems Review." IEEE J Biomed Hea Informat (2023).

Google Scholar Indexed at

4. Koo, Gunhee, Kiyoung Kim, Jun Yeon Chung and Jaemook Choi, et al. "Development of a high precision displacement measurement system by fusing a low cost RTK-GPS sensor and a force feedback accelerometer for infrastructure monitoring." Sensors 17 (2017): 2745.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

5. Herwig, Uwe, Peyman Satrapi and Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona. "Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation." Brain Topogr 16 (2003): 95-99.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

6. Assenza, G., G Pellegrino, M Tombini and G Di Pino, et al. "Wakefulness delta waves increase after cortical plasticity induction." Clin Neurophysiol 126 (2015): 1221-1227.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at