Journal of Nursing & Care

Being Best a Nursing Student Can Be, Continuous Self-Improvement, & Linear Regression Analyses

Abstract

Dale M Hilty

Purpose & Research Question/Hypotheses:

 

It is hypothesized that nursing student performance in educational and clinical settings are significant different when comparing continuous self-improvement (CSI) versus non-continuous self-improvement (NCSI) constructs.

               

Theoretical Framework & Rationale:

 

CSI students use three-dimensional processing in the classroom and clinical settings.  The three dimensions are:  "X" = outcome, "Y" application of critical thinking and concepts from theory (i.e., external), and "Z" deep level learning, knowledge, and personal growth (internal).  CSI nursing students focus on continuous self-development rather than course lecture and textbook material.  NCSI students are two-dimensional ("X" = outcome, "Y" application of critical thinking and concepts from external theory).

 

Method:

 

The Wooden Pyramid of Success Questionnaire (WPSQ) was used to differentiate CSI and NCSI nursing students.  CSI and NCSI students have completed the Big 5 Personality Factors, Conflict Handling scales, anger constructs, academic grades, patient education constructs, attachment style constructs engagement and disengagement scales, affective domain constructs, and compassion constructs.

 

Results:

 

Using the WPSQ to separate CSI and NCSI students into groups, statistically significant differences have been found related to personality, conflict handling, anger,  grades, patient education, attachment, engagement, disengagement, affective domain, and compassion.  Significant differences range from p=.001 to p=.03.

 

Nurses’ competence is based on the knowledge and skill taught to them. Nursing preparing is a blend of hypothetical and functional learning encounters that empower nursing understudies to gain the information, abilities, and perspectives for giving nursing care. Nursing instruction is made out of two reciprocal parts: hypothetical preparing and pragmatic preparing. A huge piece of nursing training is done in clinical conditions. In Iran and numerous different nations, clinical instruction frames the greater part of the formal instructive courses in nursing. In this way, clinical training is viewed as a fundamental and basic piece of the nursing schooling program. Since nursing is an exhibition based calling, clinical learning conditions assume a significant function in the procurement of expert capacities and train the nursing understudies to enter the nursing calling and become an enlisted nurture. Besides, the clinical territory of nursing instruction is critical for nursing understudies in the choice or dismissal of nursing as a calling.

 

In contrast to homeroom instruction, clinical preparing in nursing happens in a complex clinical learning climate which is impacted by numerous components. This climate gives an occasion to nursing understudies to adapt tentatively and to change hypothetical information over to an assortment of mental, mental, and psychomotor aptitudes which are of criticalness for understanding consideration. Understudies' presentation and readiness to enter the clinical setting are one of the significant elements influencing the nature of clinical training.

 

Since an ideal clinical learning climate positively affects the understudies' proficient turn of events, a helpless learning climate can effectsly affect their expert advancement measure. The capricious idea of the clinical preparing climate can make a few issues for nursing understudies.

 

The analysts' involvement with the nursing clinical instruction uncovers that nursing understudies' practices and exhibitions change in the clinical setting. This change can adversely influence their learning, progress in patient consideration, and expert execution. Recognizing issues and difficulties with which these understudies are looked in the clinical learning climate can assist partners with tackling these issues and add to them getting proficient just as their expert endurance.

 

Inability to recognize the difficulties and issues the understudies are confronted with in the clinical taking in climate keeps them from powerful learning and development. Accordingly, the development and improvement of their aptitudes will be affected. Studies show that the understudies' noneffective presentation to the clinical learning climate has expanded dropout rates. Some nursing understudies have left the calling because of difficulties they face in the clinical setting.

 

Numerous investigations have been done on the clinical climate. Some significant examinations have likewise been completed in our nation; nonetheless, a large portion of them have zeroed in on clinical assessment or stress factors in the clinical preparing. One investigation demonstrated that nursing understudies are defenseless in the clinical climate and this decreases their fulfillment with the clinical preparing. Also, the nursing understudies' absence of information and aptitudes in the clinical climate can prompt uneasiness. Yazdannik and partners found that nursing understudies experienced feeling of inadequacy in the wake of entering the facility.  

PDF