The Crucial Role of DNA Fingerprinting in the Pursuit of Forensic Accuracy

Markwerth Alaeddini^*
*Correspondence: Markwerth Alaeddini, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Montpellier, 191 Av. du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295 Montpellier, France, Email:

Introduction

Forensic science has long been a cornerstone in the pursuit of justice, allowing for the resolution of criminal cases through meticulous analysis of evidence. Among the many tools available to forensic experts, DNA fingerprinting has emerged as one of the most powerful, reliable, and transformative techniques. Introduced in the 1980s by British geneticist Sir Alec Jeffreys, DNA fingerprinting, also known as DNA profiling, has revolutionized forensic investigations by enabling the identification and comparison of individuals based on their unique genetic makeup. This technique has become indispensable in criminal justice systems worldwide, helping to solve crimes, exonerate the innocent, and link suspects to crime scenes with a high degree of certainty. The application of DNA fingerprinting in forensic science has not only led to significant advancements in the field but has also raised ethical, legal, and social considerations that continue to shape its use in the modern world [1].

DNA fingerprinting is a technique used to identify an individual based on the unique patterns in their DNA. Every personâ??s DNA is distinct, except for identical twins, making this method an effective tool for identification. Human DNA consists of sequences of nucleotides, represented by four bases: adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T). These bases form long chains called genes, which are responsible for the physical traits of an individual. While the entire genome of an individual contains approximately 3 billion base pairs, only a small fraction of the genome, known as short tandem repeats (STRs), exhibits variability between individuals. STRs are regions of the DNA that consist of repetitive sequences of base pairs. The number of repeats varies among individuals, creating unique patterns that can be used as a genetic fingerprint [2].

Description

DNA fingerprinting typically involves extracting DNA from a biological sample, such as blood, hair, or saliva, and amplifying specific STR markers through a process called Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). The resulting DNA fragments are then separated using gel electrophoresis, which creates a distinctive banding pattern. This pattern is compared to reference samples, such as those from suspects or databases, to establish a match or exclusion. One of the most well-known applications of DNA fingerprinting is in the investigation and prosecution of criminal cases. When a crime occurs, forensic investigators often collect biological samples from the crime scene, such as blood, semen, hair, or skin cells, which may contain DNA. By analyzing these samples, forensic scientists can obtain a DNA profile that can be compared to potential suspects or a DNA database. The process of DNA profiling involves comparing the DNA found at a crime scene to the DNA of a suspect. If the profiles match, it provides strong evidence that the individual was present at the crime scene. However, if the profiles do not match, it can rule out the suspect, which can be crucial in cases of wrongful accusation or exoneration [3].

In high-profile criminal cases, DNA fingerprinting has been used to establish the guilt or innocence of a suspect. A landmark example of this is the case of the â??Innocence Project,â? a non-profit organization that uses DNA evidence to exonerate wrongly convicted individuals in the United States. Since its founding, DNA evidence has helped to free hundreds of individuals who had been wrongfully convicted based on faulty evidence or misidentification. Another significant advantage of DNA fingerprinting is its ability to link a suspect to multiple crimes. In some cases, a criminal may commit several offenses before being caught. If DNA evidence from different crime scenes is compared and found to match, investigators can link these crimes to the same individual, potentially uncovering a pattern of criminal activity. DNA fingerprinting has also played a critical role in exonerating individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. In the past, criminal justice systems relied on eyewitness testimony, confessions, or circumstantial evidence, which were not always reliable. The introduction of DNA evidence has provided an objective, scientific basis for determining innocence, particularly in cases where the evidence was ambiguous or the defendant was unable to prove their innocence [4].

DNA fingerprinting has also breathed new life into cold cases-unsolved crimes that have remained open for years. Forensic scientists can revisit old cases and use modern DNA testing techniques to analyze evidence that may have been overlooked or insufficiently tested in the past. This has led to the resolution of many cold cases, some of which involved high-profile murders or disappearances. For example, the use of DNA testing in the infamous â??Golden State Killerâ? case led to the identification and arrest of Joseph James DeAngelo, a former police officer, in 2018. DeAngelo had evaded capture for over 40 years, but advancements in DNA analysis, including the use of genetic genealogy, led to his eventual apprehension. This case highlighted the potential of DNA fingerprinting in solving crimes that would have otherwise remained unsolved. While DNA fingerprinting has proven to be an invaluable tool in forensic science, its use is not without challenges and ethical considerations. One of the primary concerns is the potential for contamination or mishandling of DNA evidence. Proper collection, storage, and analysis of DNA samples are crucial to ensure that the evidence remains accurate and reliable. Contamination or degradation of samples can lead to false results or miscarriages of justice [5].

Conclusion

DNA fingerprinting has become an indispensable tool in the field of forensic science, revolutionizing criminal investigations and providing new avenues for justice. From solving cold cases to exonerating the wrongly convicted, DNA evidence has transformed the way the criminal justice system operates, offering unparalleled accuracy and reliability. Despite the challenges and ethical concerns that accompany its use, the role of DNA fingerprinting in the pursuit of forensic accuracy is undeniable. As technology continues to advance, the potential for DNA analysis to uncover the truth in criminal investigations will only continue to grow, making it a cornerstone of modern forensic science. In the future, we can expect even more refined methods of DNA profiling, allowing for greater precision in identifying individuals and linking crimes. While the use of DNA fingerprinting in forensic investigations has already had a profound impact on the criminal justice system, its full potential has yet to be realized, and its continued evolution will undoubtedly shape the future of forensic science and law enforcement worldwide.

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

1. Ludeman, Matthew J., Chang Zhong, Julio J. Mulero and Robert E. Lagacé, et al. "Developmental validation of GlobalFiler™ PCR amplification kit: A 6-dye multiplex assay designed for amplification of casework samples." Int J Legal Med 132 (2018): 1555-1573.

Google Scholar    Cross Ref    Indexed at

2. Nilsson, Martina, Göran Possnert, Hanna Edlund and Bruce Budowle, et al. "Analysis of the putative remains of a European patron saint–St. Birgitta." PLoS One 5 (2010): e8986.

Google Scholar    Cross Ref    Indexed at

3. Daly, Dyan J., Charlotte Murphy and Sean D. McDermott. "The transfer of touch DNA from hands to glass, fabric and wood." Forensic Sci Int Genet 6 (2012): 41-46.

Google Scholar    Cross Ref    Indexed at

4. Castelló, Ana, Francesc Francés and Fernando Verdú. "Solving underwater crimes: Development of latent prints made on submerged objects." Sci Justice 53 (2013): 328-331.

Google Scholar    Cross Ref    Indexed at

5. Madkour, Somaya, Fatma Badr El Dine, Yasser Elwakeel and Nermine AbdAllah. "Development of latent fingerprints on non-porous surfaces recovered from fresh and sea water." Egypt J Forensic Sci 7 (2017): 1-12.

Google Scholar    Cross Ref    Indexed at