GET THE APP

Superimposition Techinique in Human Identification: Case Reports
..

Journal of Forensic Medicine

ISSN: 2472-1026

Open Access

Case Report - (2022) Volume 7, Issue 6

Superimposition Techinique in Human Identification: Case Reports

Luiz Airton Saavedra de Paiva1* and Ana Paula Alvarenga Antonio Rabelo2
*Correspondence: Luiz Airton Saavedra de Paiva, Institute of Teaching and Research in Forensic Sciences, Av Benjamin Harris Hunnicutt, 1501-Portal dos Gramados-Guarulhos, CEP: 07124-000, São Paulo, Brazil, Email:
1Institute of Teaching and Research in Forensic Sciences, Av Benjamin Harris Hunnicutt, 1501-Portal dos Gramados-Guarulhos, CEP: 07124-000, São Paulo, Brazil
2Institute of Teaching and Research in Forensic Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil

Received: 07-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. JFM-22-82595; Editor assigned: 09-Dec-2022, Pre QC No. P-82595; Reviewed: 15-Dec-2022, QC No. Q-82595; Revised: 21-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. R-82595; Published: 28-Dec-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2472-1026.2022.7.182
Citation: Paiva, Luiz Airton Saavedra de and Ana Paula Alvarenga Antonio Rabelo. “Superimposition Technique in Human Identification: Case Reports.” J Forensic Med 7 (2022): 182.
Copyright: © 2022 Paiva LASD, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Individual identification is one of the main objectives of the forensic anthropological examination of human remains. Authoritative techniques are used in the comparison between the recorded data gathered during one’s life and the data obtained by examining the corpse. The superimposition technique, frequently used in the craniofacial segment, was applied in the maxillomandibular segment in the cases presented herein. Studies on bi-dimensional photographic superimposition were performed by means of computer-generated images, using Adobe® Photoshop® CS 6.0 © (1990-2003 Adobe Systems Incorporated) for Windows. Image superposition can be an auxiliary means in the identification process and greatly contributed to the conclusion of the forensics of individual identification.

Keywords

Forensic medicine • Forensic anthropology • Forensic dentistry • Superimposition • Computer-aided image processing

Introduction

The identification of human remains represents one of the main objectives of forensic anthropology expertise [1]. Several techniques can be used for this purpose [2].

Carbonized bodies, quartered, mutilated, and in an advanced state of putrefaction, are received at the Institutes of Forensic Medicine [3].

Forensic anthropological techniques to estimate sex, age, ancestry and stature are applied, following an established protocol [3].

To establish the individual identity, it is necessary to have life records of the individual, such as dental records, radiographs, photographs, individual characteristics (tattoos, scars, bone deformity, presence of prostheses, etc.), allowing comparison with findings from the examination on the corpse [4].

In the absence of dental records, the only available ante-mortem elements are often photographs [5].

The superimposition of computerized photographic images, widely applied to the craniofacial segment, may offer to the forensic anthropology expertise an important resource for successful identification [6,7].

Case Reports

Case 1

January, 2009: an incomplete skeleton, with dry and odorless bones. A forensic anthropological study concluded that it was a human skeleton, female, aged over 60 years, stature of about 1.60 m, ancestry predominantly from the Caucasoid group, completely edentulous.

A disused upper-arch dental prosthesis was received from the relatives of a 71-year-old woman who has disappeared since 2008.

Moldings of the internal surface of the upper prosthesis, using condensation silicone (heavy type) and irreversible hydrocolloid, allowed the obtainment of a model made in type 3 stone plaster, representing the anatomical surface of the moldable area of the user's jaw.

Anatomical comparisons between the prosthesis received and the skull showed complete coincidence through adaptation of the prosthesis to the skull. The alignment and relief of the upper alveolar ridge and the palate were also coincident with that of the plaster model's adaptation surface through the superimposition of images (Figure 1).

forensic-medicine-anatomical-coincidence

Figure 1. Superimposition between the images of the upper alveolar ridge and the upper prosthesis mold showing anatomical coincidence.

Case 2

June, 2010: a carbonized corpse with calcination of limbs. After anatomical restoration of the skull, a forensic anthropological study of the skeleton concluded to belong to the human species, female, estimated age between 14 to 19 years, stature of about 1.60 m, undetermined ancestry.

Photographs, front and left, of poor technical quality, and a hairbrush for use by a young female (for forensic hair comparison), 15 years old, missing for about 20 days, were sent by relatives.

The superimposition of digitalized images of the skull, taken in the left lateral profile, and the digitalized photo of the young woman's head revealed a craniofacial anatomical coincidence.

Anatomical coincidence was also observed between the upper dental arch of the skull and the apparent upper dentition in the photos received, from the front and left profile, digitized and enlarged, through image superimposition (Figure 2).

forensic-medicine-craniometric

Figure 2. Superimposition between photo of poor technical quality and scanned front skull images, marked with facial (red) and craniometric (yellow) points.

Both photographic superimpositions were performed by means of a computerized image, using the program Adobe® Photoshop® CS 6.0 © (1990- 2003 Adobe Systems Incorporated), in its version for the Windows system.

Results and Discussion

The literature records numerous cases where the superimposition of images was used in forensic identification.

According to Coma, it was Welcker who first described this technique (to study the skull of the poet Dante Alighieri), considered auxiliary, but which, eventually, may represent an important resource in the process of individual identification [8].

In Brazil, Silva (1932) recommended a method of identifying the photographs of the suspects to whom the skulls belonged, carrying out a prosopographical study, comparing craniometric points of the skulls with corresponding points in the suspects’ photographs [9] (Figure 3).

forensic-medicine-superimposition

Figure 3. Superimposition between scanned photo of poor technical quality and skull in left profile, showing transposition of the upper dental contour line.

In 1935, the Ruxton case, of great repercussion, had the identification of the two homicide victims carried out using the craniofacial photographic superimposition technique [10].

In the 1990s, there were studies showing the use of computerized images to assist this technique [11,12].

Presence of teeth in the skull and photographs with the individual's apparent teeth facilitate the comparison, providing much more accurate results [5].

Mackenna et al. consider that with these aspects present, a categorical or unambiguous identification can be obtained. Otherwise, the identification would be impaired and could only be classified as highly probable or just consistent. In cases where the identification by the aforesaid technique is classified only as consistent, the presence of other evidence can allow a satisfactory conclusion [13].

In a recent article focusing on new developments in facial photographic superimposition, Ubelaker, Wu and Cord state, in their conclusions, what represents a great reality in developing countries [14]:

“Use of these techniques has been marginalized in some regions in favor of molecular analysis aimed at identification. However, interest remains strong in many parts of the world where DNA laboratories are less available or cost prohibitive. Economic issues also are associated with the new technological advances in craniofacial superimposition since some require equipment not universally available”.

Conclusion

The application of the photographic superimposition technique, as described herein, in both cases allows a favorable conclusion to the importance of the anatomical individuality character of the maxillomandibular complex, mainly due to the significant anatomical particularity of human teeth, normal or altered by morbidities or by treatments, making it possible to achieve a high degree of scientific certainty in comparative studies.

Image superimposition techniques, often used to study anatomical correspondence between the skull skeleton and the soft tissues of the face, allow them to be applied to anatomical segments, contributing to the certainty of the expert conclusion and representing still an economically viable and reasonably safe technique.

References

  1. Komar, Debra A. and Jane E. Buikstra. “Forensic anthropology: contemporary theory and practice.” Oxford University Press, USA, (2008).
  2. Google Scholar

  3. Reichs, Kathy and William M. Bass. “Forensic osteology: advances in the identification of human remains.” Charles C Thomas Pub Limited, (1998).
  4. Google Scholar

  5. Paiva, Las. “Antropologia forense: Roteiro para identificação médico-legal.” Revista Sthetos, 2 (2009):31-46.
  6. Byers, Sn. “Introduction to forensic anthropology.” Pearson Boston, MA, (2017).
  7. Santoro, Valeria, Federica Mele, Francesco Introna and Antonio De Donno. "Personal identification through digital photo superimposition of dental profile: A pilot study." J Forens Odonto Stomat 37 (2019): 21.
  8. Google Scholar

  9. Aulsebrook, W.A., M.Y. İşcan, J.H. Slabbert and P. Becker. "Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey." Forens Sci Inter 75 (1995): 101-120.
  10. Google Scholar

  11. de Paiva, Luiz Airton Saavedra, Rodolfo Francisco Haltenhoff Melani and Silvia Virginia Tedeschi Oliveira. "Identificação humana através da sobreposição de imagens." Saúde Ética Justiça 10 (2005): 1-5.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Coma, José M Reverte. “Antropología forense.” Ministerio de Justicia (2013).
  14. Google Scholar

  15. Silva, L. “Odontologia Legal.” Imprensa Metodista, São Paulo, SP, (1932).
  16. Glaister, John and James Couper Brash. “Medico-legal aspects of the Ruxton case.” Wood, (1937).
  17. Google Scholar

  18. Nickerson, B.A., P.A. Fitzhorn, S.K. Koch and M. Charney. "A methodology for near-optimal computational superimposition of two-dimensional digital facial photographs and three-dimensional cranial surface meshes." J Forens Sci 36 (1991): 480-500.
  19. Google Scholar

  20. Ubelaker, Douglas H., Erica Bubniak and Gene O'Donnell. "Computer-assisted photographic superimposition." J  Forens Sci 37 (1992): 750-762.
  21. Google Scholar

  22. McKenna, J.J.I., Nina G. Jablonski and R.W. Fearnhead. "A method of matching skulls with photographic portraits using landmarks and measurements of the dentition." J Forens Sci 29 (1984): 787-797.
  23. Google Scholar      

  24. Ubelaker, Douglas H., Yaohan Wu and Quinnlan R. Cordero. "Craniofacial photographic superimposition: New developments." Forens Sci Inter Syner 1 (2019): 271-274.
  25. Google Scholar

arrow_upward arrow_upward