Optimizing Tissue Processing for Molecular Diagnostics

Elena V. Marquez^*
*Correspondence: Elena V. Marquez, Department of Surgical Pathology, Albright Institute of Medical Sciences, Cordale City, USA, Email:

Introduction

Recent advancements are profoundly reshaping tissue processing techniques vital for routine histopathology. These innovations are designed to significantly improve turnaround times, meticulously preserve tissue morphology, and crucially enhance molecular assay compatibility. This includes a discussion of new fixatives, sophisticated automated systems, and advanced embedding media, all collectively pushing the boundaries of diagnostic pathology [1].

Exploring preanalytical considerations for molecular analysis, especially when using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues, is critical. This work highlights in great detail how specific tissue processing methods directly influence the integrity of nucleic acids and proteins. It offers valuable insights into standardizing fixation, processing, and storage protocols, thereby ensuring the consistent production of high-quality specimens perfectly suitable for advanced molecular diagnostics [2].

Furthermore, an innovative microfluidic device has been introduced, specifically engineered for automated tissue processing. This device is optimized for preparing samples for whole-slide imaging, demonstrating effectively how microfluidics can streamline crucial steps like dehydration, clearing, and paraffin infiltration. This innovation leads to a significant reduction in processing time and substantially enhances standardization, which is a major benefit for modern digital pathology workflows [3].

Another area of intense focus is the review of current and emerging strategies in biospecimen preanalytics. These strategies are particularly crucial for high-resolution spatial biology techniques. The review meticulously examines how various tissue processing steps, from the initial collection to long-term preservation, directly impact the overall quality and integrity of biomolecules, which are essential for advanced spatial omics applications. The emphasis here is firmly on optimization to support sensitive analyses [4].

The challenges and opportunities surrounding formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue processing, especially for advanced analytical methods, are thoroughly addressed. This discussion reveals how distinct fixation and embedding protocols can profoundly affect the integrity of macromolecules. The research provides practical insights into optimizing FFPE samples for cutting-edge genomics, proteomics, and various other high-throughput analyses [5].

A critical examination has been performed on the impact of preanalytical variables, particularly those occurring during the tissue processing phase, on the ultimate quality of nucleic acids and proteins. This impact affects both diagnostic and research applications. The findings underscore the paramount importance of standardized protocols for tissue handling, fixation, and storage, which are essential to minimize degradation and guarantee reliable downstream molecular analyses [6].

Significant progress has been made in tissue clearing techniques. These are specialized tissue processing methods that now enable advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging of complex biological samples. The research discusses a range of chemical protocols capable of rendering tissues transparent while meticulously preserving their structural integrity and vital molecular information. This breakthrough is crucial for studying intricate tissue architectures at an organ level [7].

In an effort to advance tissue processing, various alternatives to traditional formalin fixation have been explored. The advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives are discussed, specifically concerning their ability to preserve morphology and maintain molecular integrity. This investigation emphasizes the growing necessity for fixatives that are less toxic and more compatible with advanced molecular diagnostic techniques, ultimately paving the way for improved diagnostic accuracy [8].

Advancements in rapid tissue processing techniques are also noteworthy, especially those developed for intraoperative frozen section diagnosis. These new methodologies deliver a significant reduction in processing time while consistently maintaining diagnostic quality. This capability is exceptionally crucial for enabling timely and accurate clinical decision-making during surgical procedures [9].

Finally, a practical guide is offered for optimizing specimen processing techniques specifically for whole slide imaging within digital pathology workflows. This guide strongly emphasizes how various preanalytical variables, including the precise methods of fixation, dehydration, and embedding, directly influence the resulting image quality and, consequently, the accuracy of subsequent diagnoses within a fully digitized environment [10].

Description

Tissue processing lies at the heart of diagnostic pathology and biomedical research, constantly evolving to meet the demands of advanced analytical methods. Recent advancements are comprehensively reshaping these techniques, aiming for faster turnaround times, superior tissue morphology preservation, and enhanced compatibility with complex molecular assays. This evolution includes the development of innovative fixatives, sophisticated automated systems, and novel embedding media, all contributing to pushing the very limits of diagnostic capabilities [1]. These efforts reflect a broader understanding of how initial processing steps fundamentally influence downstream analysis.

A critical area of focus involves the intricate preanalytical considerations for molecular analysis, especially when working with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. The methodologies employed during tissue processing have a profound impact on the integrity of nucleic acids and proteins, which are vital for accurate molecular diagnostics. Therefore, standardizing protocols for fixation, processing, and storage is not merely a recommendation but a necessity to ensure high-quality specimens suitable for sophisticated molecular diagnostic applications [2, 6]. Addressing the inherent challenges and leveraging opportunities associated with FFPE tissue processing for advanced analytical methods is paramount. Specific fixation and embedding protocols directly influence macromolecular integrity, making optimization crucial for genomics, proteomics, and other high-throughput analyses [5]. Biospecimen preanalytics are equally vital for high-resolution spatial biology techniques, where the quality and integrity of biomolecules are highly sensitive to processing steps, from initial collection to final preservation [4].

Innovation extends to new technological solutions designed to streamline and improve processing. Microfluidic devices, for instance, represent a significant leap forward in automated tissue processing, specifically optimizing samples for whole-slide imaging. These devices demonstrate an ability to efficiently manage dehydration, clearing, and paraffin infiltration, leading to a substantial reduction in processing time and fostering greater standardization within digital pathology workflows [3]. Beyond two-dimensional imaging, recent strides in tissue clearing techniques offer specialized methods for three-dimensional (3D) imaging of biological samples. These chemical protocols effectively render tissues transparent while meticulously preserving structural integrity and crucial molecular information, opening new avenues for understanding complex tissue architectures at an organ level [7]. Furthermore, the industry is actively exploring alternatives to traditional formalin fixation, driven by a recognized need for less toxic fixatives that are more compatible with contemporary molecular diagnostic techniques, thereby improving overall diagnostic accuracy [8].

The integration of these processing advancements into clinical practice is already impacting areas such as intraoperative decision-making. Rapid tissue processing techniques, particularly those developed for intraoperative frozen section diagnosis, have seen significant improvements. These new methodologies can dramatically reduce processing time while consistently maintaining the high diagnostic quality required for timely clinical insights during surgery [9]. Moreover, the ongoing transition to digital pathology workflows necessitates a clear understanding of how preanalytical variables influence the final output. Optimizing specimen processing techniques, including fixation, dehydration, and embedding, is paramount for achieving superior image quality and ensuring diagnostic accuracy in a fully digitized environment [10].

In essence, the field is undergoing a transformative period where meticulous attention to tissue processing and its preanalytical variables is yielding significant benefits. From enhancing the precision of molecular diagnostics to enabling sophisticated 3D imaging and accelerating clinical decisions, the advancements discussed collectively pave the way for more accurate, efficient, and reliable pathological analyses.

Conclusion

Recent advancements are reshaping tissue processing techniques for routine histopathology, aiming to improve turnaround times, preserve morphology, and enhance molecular assay compatibility. Innovations include new fixatives, automated systems, and advanced embedding media. A crucial focus is on preanalytical considerations for molecular analysis, particularly with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Methods for tissue processing significantly impact the integrity of nucleic acids and proteins, making standardization of fixation, processing, and storage protocols essential for high-quality specimens suitable for advanced molecular diagnostics. Several studies highlight the importance of optimizing FFPE samples for genomics, proteomics, and other high-throughput analyses, addressing associated challenges and opportunities. The impact of preanalytical variables on tissue-based diagnostic and research applications, specifically concerning nucleic acid and protein quality, underscores the need for standardized protocols to minimize degradation. New technologies, such as microfluidic devices, are emerging for automated tissue processing, optimizing samples for whole-slide imaging and streamlining dehydration, clearing, and paraffin infiltration. This significantly reduces processing time and enhances standardization in digital pathology workflows. Biospecimen preanalytics are also critical for high-resolution spatial biology techniques, with various processing steps influencing biomolecule quality for advanced spatial omics applications. Furthermore, tissue clearing techniques are advancing, enabling 3D imaging of biological samples by rendering tissues transparent while preserving structural and molecular information. The search for alternatives to traditional formalin fixation is ongoing, driven by the need for less toxic fixatives compatible with modern molecular diagnostic techniques. Rapid tissue processing methods for intraoperative frozen section diagnosis are also seeing advancements, ensuring timely clinical decision-making. Optimizing specimen processing for whole slide imaging directly impacts image quality and diagnostic accuracy in digitized environments.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

Shi C, Kang W, Yi L. "Advances in Tissue Processing and Embedding for Histopathology.".Pathobiology 90 (2023):521-532.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Nabil B, Jörn S, Benedikt H. "Optimizing Preanalytical Steps for Molecular Analysis in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues: A Review.".Methods Mol Biol 2758 (2024):1-27.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Chih-Chiang L, Kuan-Yu C, Chieh-Hsiang P. "Automatic tissue processing using a microfluidic device for whole-slide imaging.".Sci Rep 12 (2022):11094.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Julian N, Markus R, Robert M. "Current Strategies and Future Trends in Biospecimen Preanalytics for High-Resolution Spatial Biology.".Cancers (Basel) 15 (2023):4099.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Jaime O, Jorge V, Ariadna S. "Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue processing: Challenges and opportunities for advanced analytical methods.".Pathobiology 89 (2022):1-13.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Amiran K, Ulrike D, Krystyna E. "Impact of Preanalytical Variables on Tissue-Based Diagnostic and Research Applications: Focus on Nucleic Acid and Protein Quality.".Molecules 28 (2023):7460.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Chang C, Deyang C, Haotian Z. "Recent advances in tissue clearing techniques for three-dimensional imaging.".Curr Opin Biomed Eng 26 (2023):100455.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Ablajan A, Cong S, Juan H. "Alternatives to formalin fixation for tissue processing: A review of current practices and future perspectives.".J Clin Pathol 74 (2021):649-654.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Xia L, Jin C, Song W. "Advances in rapid tissue processing methods for intraoperative frozen section diagnosis.".Histol Histopathol 38 (2023):1-10.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Varun S, Thomas J, Mary P. "Preanalytical Variables in Digital Pathology: Optimizing Specimen Processing for Whole Slide Imaging.".J Pathol Inform 11 (2020):19.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref