GET THE APP

Multifaceted and Integrated Technological System Design
Global Journal of Technology and Optimization

Global Journal of Technology and Optimization

ISSN: 2229-8711

Open Access

Short Communication - (2025) Volume 16, Issue 2

Multifaceted and Integrated Technological System Design

Chen Wei*
*Correspondence: Chen Wei, Department of Automation and Intelligent Machines, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, China, China, Email:
Department of Automation and Intelligent Machines, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, China, China

Received: 28-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. gjto-25-175409; Editor assigned: 31-Mar-2025, Pre QC No. P-175409; Reviewed: 14-Apr-2025, QC No. QC-175409; Revised: 20-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. R-175409; Published: 28-Apr-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2229-8711.2025.16.443
Citation: Wei, Chen. ”Multifaceted and Integrated Technological System Design.” Global J Technol Optim 16 (2025):443.
Copyright: © 2025 Wei C. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

           

Introduction

The landscape of technological system design is continually evolving, driven by the increasing complexity of integrated systems and the demand for enhanced performance, reliability, and human interaction. A foundational area of study involves understanding the methodologies and key aspects for designing Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), which seamlessly integrate computational and physical elements. This systematic review offers crucial insights for developing robust, efficient, and intelligent CPS across various applications [1]. Beyond the technical integration, the human element remains central to system effectiveness. Modern design philosophies increasingly adopt a socio-technical perspective, recognizing that technological systems operate within human and organizational contexts. Research in this area explores the essential integration of human factors into technological system design, outlining strategies to consider human interaction, organizational dynamics, and social implications to enhance system usability, acceptance, and overall performance in real-world contexts [2].

Adaptability is another critical characteristic for contemporary technological systems, especially those operating in dynamic and unpredictable environments. Designing systems capable of responding to change is crucial for sustained operational effectiveness. A framework has been developed for designing technological systems that can adapt to rapidly changing environments, emphasizing critical elements like modularity, reconfigurability, and intelligent control, allowing systems to autonomously adjust their structure and behavior [3]. The advent of advanced technologies, such as digital twins, is revolutionizing how systems are designed and managed, particularly in manufacturing. These virtual replicas offer unprecedented capabilities for real-time monitoring and optimization. A comprehensive review examines how digital twin technology is transforming the design process for smart manufacturing systems, detailing architectures, diverse applications, and inherent challenges in leveraging digital twins for real-time simulation, optimization, and predictive maintenance throughout a system's lifecycle [4].

As systems become more autonomous, ensuring effective human collaboration and trust becomes paramount. Human-centered design principles are indispensable for developing autonomous technological systems that are not only efficient but also safe and user-friendly. A review highlights the challenges in ensuring trust, transparency, and effective collaboration between humans and automation, while also identifying opportunities to enhance user experience and safety outcomes in autonomous systems [5]. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fundamentally reshaping the design process itself, moving towards automation and intelligent decision-making. AI-enabled design automation promises to accelerate development and optimize complex system configurations. Research surveys how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the design automation of complex technological systems, exploring various AI techniques applied to design synthesis, optimization, and verification, outlining future directions for developing more efficient and intelligent design processes [6].

For critical infrastructure, the focus extends to designing for inherent resilience against disruptions and threats. Protecting these vital systems requires proactive strategies to ensure continuity and safety. A systematic review discusses strategies for anticipating, adapting to, and recovering from disruptions in critical infrastructure systems, aiming to enhance overall system robustness and safety in the face of unforeseen events and dynamic operational conditions [7]. Sustainability has become a non-negotiable aspect of modern design and development. Integrating environmental considerations early in the design phase is crucial for minimizing ecological footprints. An article reviews the integration of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in product design and development, advocating for early consideration of sustainability in technological systems, outlining how LCA can evaluate environmental impacts from material extraction to end-of-life, guiding designers toward more eco-friendly solutions [8].

To manage the increasing complexity of modern technological systems, especially within the context of Industry 4.0, advanced engineering methodologies are essential. Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) provides a structured approach for this challenge. A paper offers a review and future outlook on applying Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) for technological system design within the Industry 4.0 context, underscoring MBSE's role in managing system complexity, enhancing collaboration, and ensuring consistency across diverse design phases, ultimately streamlining development efforts [9]. Finally, security cannot be an afterthought but must be embedded from the initial stages of design, particularly for critical infrastructure. This proactive stance ensures systems are built with defenses against evolving threats. This article focuses on the principles and practice of integrating security-by-design into critical infrastructure systems, highlighting the importance of proactive security measures throughout the entire design lifecycle, aiming to mitigate vulnerabilities and enhance overall resilience against evolving cyber threats [10].

 

Description

Designing contemporary technological systems involves navigating intricate challenges and leveraging advanced methodologies. The foundational aspect of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) design, for instance, requires mapping comprehensive methodologies for integrating computational and physical elements effectively. This approach is vital for creating robust and intelligent CPS across diverse applications [1]. A critical parallel lies in incorporating human factors into technological system design, adopting a socio-technical perspective. This ensures that human interaction, organizational dynamics, and social implications are considered, ultimately enhancing system usability, acceptance, and performance in real-world settings [2]. The ability of systems to adapt to dynamic environments is equally important, with frameworks emphasizing modularity, reconfigurability, and intelligent control allowing autonomous adjustments to structure and behavior for sustained effectiveness [3].

Innovation drives the evolution of design processes. Digital twin technology is a prime example, significantly transforming smart manufacturing systems. This comprehensive review details the architectures, diverse applications, and inherent challenges involved in using digital twins for real-time simulation, optimization, and predictive maintenance throughout a system's lifecycle [4]. Closely related to this technological advancement is the pivotal role of human-centered design in autonomous systems. Challenges include ensuring trust, transparency, and effective collaboration between humans and automation, while also identifying opportunities to enhance user experience and safety outcomes in these sophisticated systems [5]. Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as a transformative force in design automation for complex technological systems. Research explores various AI techniques applied to design synthesis, optimization, and verification, charting future directions for more efficient and intelligent design processes [6]. Beyond efficiency, the resilience of critical infrastructure systems is a paramount concern. Designing for resilience involves implementing strategies to anticipate, adapt to, and recover from disruptions, thereby enhancing overall system robustness and safety in the face of unforeseen events and dynamic operational conditions [7].

Sustainability considerations are increasingly integrated into the early stages of product design and development. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) serves as a key tool, enabling the evaluation of environmental impacts from material extraction to end-of-life stages. This guides designers toward more eco-friendly solutions for technological systems [8]. Furthermore, managing the complexity inherent in modern systems, particularly within the Industry 4.0 context, benefits significantly from Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). This approach streamlines development efforts by enhancing collaboration and ensuring consistency across diverse design phases [9]. Finally, the integrity and security of critical infrastructure systems demand a 'security-by-design' approach. This means embedding proactive security measures throughout the entire design lifecycle. Such an approach aims to mitigate vulnerabilities and enhance overall resilience against evolving cyber threats, ensuring the long-term safety and reliability of essential services [10]. Collectively, these distinct yet interconnected research areas paint a picture of a dynamic field, where technological ingenuity meets societal needs and environmental responsibilities.

Conclusion

Recent advancements in technological system design highlight a multifaceted approach, addressing complexities across various domains. Research extensively maps the methodologies for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), emphasizing the integration of computational and physical elements to create intelligent and robust applications [1]. A key focus is the essential integration of human factors, adopting a socio-technical perspective to improve usability, acceptance, and overall system performance in real-world contexts [2]. Furthermore, designing systems for adaptability in dynamic environments is crucial. Frameworks promoting modularity, reconfigurability, and intelligent control allow systems to autonomously adjust their structure and behavior for sustained effectiveness [3]. Digital twin technology is also transforming smart manufacturing, offering real-time simulation, optimization, and predictive maintenance throughout a system's lifecycle [4]. In parallel, human-centered design for autonomous systems addresses challenges in trust, transparency, and human-automation collaboration to enhance user experience and safety [5]. Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays a pivotal role in reshaping design automation for complex systems, exploring techniques for synthesis, optimization, and verification, promising more efficient design processes [6]. For critical infrastructure, designing for resilience is paramount, involving strategies to anticipate, adapt, and recover from disruptions to ensure robustness and safety [7]. Sustainability is also integral, with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) guiding designers toward eco-friendly solutions from material extraction to end-of-life [8]. Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) offers a streamlined approach for managing complexity, enhancing collaboration, and ensuring consistency in technological system design within the Industry 4.0 context [9]. Finally, integrating security-by-design into critical infrastructure is vital, focusing on proactive measures throughout the design lifecycle to mitigate vulnerabilities against evolving cyber threats [10]. These diverse areas collectively underscore the comprehensive and dynamic nature of modern technological system design.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

Gabriel HRD, Leonardo SDdS, Alex GdOdM. "Design for a Cyber-Physical System: A Systematic Review".IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 21 (2023):566-574.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Mariana RV, Luis CPdS, José CJdS. "Integrating Human Factors into Technological System Design: A Socio-Technical Perspective".Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 165 (2022):102871.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Hector ARG, Sang BK, Liang-Chih C. "A Framework for Designing Adaptive Technological Systems in Dynamic Environments".IEEE Syst. J. 15 (2021):4424-4433.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Peng BX, Jun W, Shen L. "Digital twin-driven design for smart manufacturing technological systems: A comprehensive review".J. Manuf. Syst. 65 (2022):112-127.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Michael JL, Mark RL, Thomas JA. "Challenges in human-centred design of autonomous systems: A literature review".Ergonomics 63 (2020):1227-1249.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Yan LZ, Bo TL, Hong W. "AI-enabled design automation for complex technological systems: A review and future perspectives".Autom. Constr. 157 (2024):105151.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Mark BG, John PD, Sarah ET. "Designing for resilience in critical infrastructure systems: A systematic review".Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 228 (2022):108785.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Martin CK, Johan MA, Erik BL. "Life cycle assessment in product design and development: A review".J. Clean. Prod. 301 (2021):126922.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Fabian RGS, Daniel MS, Philip KM. "Model-Based Systems Engineering for Industry 4.0: A Review and Future Outlook".Procedia CIRP 93 (2020):312-317.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Andreas US, Christoph RR, Lars GM. "Security by Design in Critical Infrastructure: Principles and Practice".Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 34 (2021):100455.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 847

Global Journal of Technology and Optimization received 847 citations as per Google Scholar report

Global Journal of Technology and Optimization peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward