Multidimensional 3D-printed Scaffolds: A Revolutionary Approach for Regeneration of Intrabony Periodontal Defects

Matthew Clark^*
*Correspondence: Matthew Clark, Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK, Email:

Introduction

Intrabony periodontal defects pose significant challenges in traditional dental regeneration therapies. However, recent advancements in tissue engineering have introduced multidimensional 3D-printed scaffolds as a promising solution for periodontal tissue regeneration. This article explores the principles behind 3D-printed scaffolds, their fabrication techniques, and their application in regenerating intrabony periodontal defects. Additionally, it discusses the advantages, limitations, and future prospects of this innovative approach [1].

Periodontal diseases, characterized by the destruction of periodontal tissues, are a major cause of tooth loss worldwide. Intrabony periodontal defects, resulting from the progression of periodontitis, present a particular challenge due to their complex three-dimensional nature [2]. Traditional treatment methods, such as guided tissue regeneration and bone grafting, have limitations in achieving complete and predictable regeneration of periodontal tissues. However, the emergence of multidimensional 3D-printed scaffolds offers a revolutionary approach to address these challenges [3].

Description

3D-printed scaffolds are designed to mimic the architecture and properties of the Extracellular Matrix (ECM), providing a supportive framework for cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation [4]. These scaffolds can be customized to match the specific dimensions and contours of intrabony periodontal defects, enhancing their regenerative potential. Key factors influencing the design of 3D-printed scaffolds include pore size, porosity, interconnectivity, mechanical strength, and biocompatibility. Various fabrication techniques are employed to produce 3D-printed scaffolds, including Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Stereolithography (SLA), Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), and inkjet 3D printing. Each technique offers unique advantages in terms of resolution, speed, material selection, and cost-effectiveness. Biocompatible materials commonly used for scaffold fabrication include synthetic polymers, natural polymers, ceramics, and composite materials. Surface modification techniques, such as biofunctionalization and growth factor immobilization, can further enhance the bioactivity of 3D-printed scaffolds. The use of 3D-printed scaffolds in regenerating intrabony periodontal defects involves a multi-step process. First, digital imaging techniques, such as Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanning, are used to capture the threedimensional geometry of the defect. Next, Computer-aided Design (CAD) software is utilized to design patient-specific scaffolds tailored to the individual anatomy of the defect. The fabricated scaffolds are then surgically placed into the defect site, where they serve as a framework for cell ingrowth and tissue regeneration.

Multidimensional 3D-printed scaffolds offer several advantages over traditional regeneration therapies, including precise customization, enhanced biocompatibility, and controlled release of bioactive factors. Moreover, their ability to accommodate multiple cell types and growth factors allows for synergistic interactions that promote tissue regeneration. However, challenges such as limited scalability, material biodegradation, and regulatory approval remain significant hurdles to widespread clinical adoption. Despite the current challenges, the future of 3D-printed scaffolds in periodontal regeneration looks promising. Ongoing research efforts focus on refining scaffold design, optimizing material properties, and integrating advanced biofabrication techniques, such as bioprinting and nanotechnology. Furthermore, clinical studies evaluating the long-term efficacy and safety of 3D-printed scaffolds will provide valuable insights into their clinical utility and potential for widespread adoption [5].

Conclusion

Multidimensional 3D-printed scaffolds represent a paradigm shift in the field of periodontal regeneration, offering unprecedented opportunities to address the limitations of traditional treatment modalities. By leveraging advanced fabrication techniques and biomaterials, these scaffolds hold the potential to revolutionize the management of intrabony periodontal defects and improve patient outcomes. However, further research and clinical validation are necessary to fully realize their therapeutic potential and facilitate their integration into routine dental practice.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Assiri, Hassan, Ali Azhar Dawasaz, Ahmad Alahmari and Zuhair Asiri. "Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in periodontal diseases: A systematic review based on the efficacy model."BMC Oral Health20 (2020): 1-15.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Slots, Jørgen. "Periodontitis: Facts, fallacies and the future."Periodontol 75 (2017): 7-23.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Papapanou, Panos N., Mariano Sanz, Nurcan Buduneli and Thomas Dietrich, et al. "Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions."J Periodontol 89 (2018): S173-S182.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Pihlstrom, Bruce L., Bryan S. Michalowicz and Newell W. Johnson. "Periodontal diseases." Lancet366 (2005): 1809-1820.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Susin, Cristiano, Rui V. Oppermann, Ola Haugejorden and Jasim M. Albandar. "Tooth loss and associated risk indicators in an adult urban population from South Brazil."Acta Odontol Scandin63 (2005): 85-93.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at