GET THE APP

Management of Mitral Stenosis in Pregnancy
..

Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis

ISSN: 2329-9517

Open Access

Opinion - (2021) Volume 9, Issue 11

Management of Mitral Stenosis in Pregnancy

Wilbert S. Aronow*
*Correspondence: Wilbert S. Aronow, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA, Email:
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA

Received: 05-Nov-2021 Published: 26-Nov-2021
Citation: Aronow, Wilbert S. "Management of Mitral Stenosis in Pregnancy." J Cardiovasc Dis Diagn 9 (2021): 495.
Copyright: © 2021 Aronow WS. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Opinion

Because rheumatic fever is the primary cause of mitral stenosis, secondary prophylaxis against group a beta-hemolytic streptococcus is recommended. The recommended regimen for prevention of recurrent rheumatic fever is an intramuscular injection of 1,200,000 units of benzathiazine penicillin every 4 weeks for most patients and every 3 weeks in populations in which the incidence of rheumatic fever is very high. Penicillin V 250 mg twice daily or sulfadiazine 500 mg to 1,000 mg once daily dependent on weight may be used. For penicillin-allergic persons, a narrow-spectrum oral cephalosporin, oral clindamycin, or various oral macrolides or azalides should be used. Prophylaxis should continue until at least age 40 and perhaps for life in persons with increased exposure to streptococcal infections. Prophylaxis should continue even after valve surgery. The current American Heart Association guidelines no longer recommend routine bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis for persons with rheumatic mitral stenosis. For the patients with rheumatic heart disease in whom infective endocarditis prophylaxis remains recommended such as patients with prosthetic valves or prosthetic material used in valve repair, a drug other than penicillin is recommended to prevent infective endocarditis in patients receiving penicillin for rheumatic fever prophylaxis.

Patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm with exertional symptoms occurring with high ventricular rates should be treated with a beta blocker, verapamil, or diltiazem. Dietary sodium restriction and diuretic therapy should be used to treat symptoms due to pulmonary congestion. Reduction of preload by oral nitrates may also be beneficial. Prolongation of the diastolic filling time by beta blockers can reduce left atrial pressure. Treatment of an acute episode of atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular rate consists of anticoagulation with heparin and reduction of the ventricular rate by intravenous beta blockers, diltiazem, or verapamil and with amiodarone if these drugs cannot be used. If there is hemodynamic instability, the patient should be treated with directcurrent cardioversion immediately with intravenous heparin administered before, during, and after the procedure.

The ventricular rate in patients with atrial fibrillation should be controlled long-term by use of beta blockers, verapamil, diltiazem, amiodarone, or digoxin. Class I indications for use of oral warfarin in patients with mitral stenosis are paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation or a prior thromboembolic event in a patient with sinus rhythm with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) maintained between 2.0 to 3.0 or a left atrial thrombus with the INR maintained between 2.5 to 3.5 . The novel anticoagulant drugs such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban are not approved for treatment of atrial fibrillation associated with valvular heart disease.

Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2006 guidelines recommend that Percutaneous Mitral Balloon Valvotomy (PMBV) is effective for symptomatic patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II, III, or IV symptoms with moderate or severe mitral stenosis (mitral valve area of 1.5 cm2 or less) with a valve morphology suitable for PMBV in the absence of left atrial thrombus or moderate to severe mitral regurgitation with a class I indication. Transesophageal echocardiography should be performed with a class I indication to assess the presence or absence of left atrial thrombus and to further evaluate the severity of mitral regurgitation in patients considered for PMBV. These guidelines also recommend with a class I indication that PMBV is effective for asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe mitral stenosis and a valve morphology suitable for PMBV who have a pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than 50 mm Hg at rest or greater than 60 mm Hg with exercise in the absence of left atrial thrombus or moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. These guidelines recommend with a class IIa indication PMBV for patients with moderate or severe mitral stenosis who have a nonpliable calcified valve, have NYHA functional class III or IV symptoms, and either is not candidates for surgery or are at high risk for surgery. PMBV is not indicated for patients with mild mitral stenosis and should not be performed in patients with left atrial thrombus or moderate to severe mitral regurgitation. For elderly patients with symptomatic mitral stenosis who have an uncalcified mitral valve or mild calcific deposits, flexible mitral valve leaflets, and no or mild mitral regurgitation and no left atrial thrombus, PMBV is the procedure of choice.

Indications for mitral valve surgery

Mitral valve surgery (repair if possible) is indicated with a class I indication in patients with NYHA functional class II-IV symptoms with moderate or severe mitral stenosis when (1) PMBV is unavailable, (2) when PMBV is contraindicated because of left atrial thrombus despite adequate anticoagulation or because of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation, or (3) because the mitral valve morphology is unfavorable for PMBV in a patient with an acceptable operative risk. Symptomatic patients with moderate to severe mitral stenosis with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation should receive mitral valve replacement unless mitral valve repair is possible at the time of surgery with a class I indication. Mitral valve replacement should be considered in patients with severe mitral stenosis and a pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than 60 mm Hg at rest with NYHA functional class I or II symptoms who are not considered candidates for PMBV or surgical mitral valve repair with a class IIa indication. Mitral valve repair for mitral stenosis should not be performed in patients with mild mitral stenosis (classs III indication). Closed commissurotomy should not be performed in patients undergoing mitral valve repair (class III indication). Open commissurotomy is the preferred approach. In current practice, surgery for mitral stenosis is approximately 95% valve replacement because of elderly presentation and unfavorable characteristics for valve repair. Consider open mitral commissurotomy if the mitral valve is flexible enough to open when the commissures are released, mitral regurgitation is minimal, the subvalvular apparatus is obstructive, and there is a thrombus in the left atrium, especially in the body of the left atrium after 2 to 3 months of adequate anticoagulation therapy.

Pregnancy

Mitral stenosis is the most common valvular lesion in pregnant women. The management of mitral stenosis in pregnant women is discussed extensively elsewhere.

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 427

Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis received 427 citations as per Google Scholar report

Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward