GET THE APP

Claustrophobia with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy for Sleep Apnea: Editorial
..

Journal of Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

ISSN: 2684-6012

Open Access

Editorial - (2022) Volume 5, Issue 1

Claustrophobia with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy for Sleep Apnea: Editorial

Hussain Taylor*
*Correspondence: Hussain Taylor, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, UK, Email:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge, UK

Received: 04-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. jcnn-22-45676; Editor assigned: 06-Jan-2022, Pre QC No. P-45676; Reviewed: 10-Jan-2022, QC No. Q-45676; Revised: 15-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. R-45676; Published: 21-Jan-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/jcnn.2022.5.133
Citation: Taylor, Hussain. “Claustrophobia with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy for Sleep Apnea: Editorial.” Clin Neurol Neurosurg 5(2022): 133
Copyright: © 2022 Taylor H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

In individuals with obstructive sleep apnea, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) successfully eliminates sleep-related upper airway blockage, decreases blood pressure, reduces daytime somnolence, and improves quality of life (OSA). Despite its effectiveness, adherence to CPAP therapy is famously difficult; CPAP therapy necessitates a considerable lifestyle adjustment that includes nightly application and usage of a mask while sleeping, which can be burdensome, invasive, and painful. According to estimates, CPAP adherence rates range from 30% to 60%. Non-adherence to CPAP can be caused by a variety of variables, including CPAP device malfunctions, adverse effects, and/or patient characteristics, as well as psychological, behavioural, and social aspects. Claustrophobia, or anxiety, fear of suffocation, or panic in reaction to CPAP therapy, is a substantial barrier to CPAP adherence that patients frequently report.

Claustrophobia is a typical CPAP therapy side effect that might lead to treatment discontinuation. With CPAP, about 30% of sleep apnea patients report feeling claustrophobic or enclosed. According to a recent study, sleep apnea patients had substantially greater rates of claustrophobic tendencies 63%, especially in females 84% than in males 44%. Patients consider claustrophobia to be one of the most significant barriers to CPAP therapy, with less than half of patients saying that they would use CPAP if they were claustrophobic.

CPAP-related claustrophobia interventions have been developed on the assumption that the phobic reaction to CPAP is conceptually similar to other phobias (e.g., fear of heights, fear of flying) and thus should be treatable with the same psychological interventions (e.g., graded exposure therapy, systematic desensitisation). The goal of graded exposure therapy and systematic desensitisation is to break the learned link between the feared object and the anxiety response. With the help of a therapist, the individual creates a hierarchy of steps connected to the dreaded object or circumstance in graded exposure therapy.

CPAP is the most common treatment for OSA, although many patients have difficulty sticking to it. Claustrophobia is a common CPAP side effect that is defined as a feeling of being hemmed in or suffocated. Exposure-based therapies have shown some promise in treating claustrophobia caused by CPAP. Such therapies have yet to be subjected to rigorous scientific examination; the condition of research support is generally poor, with uncontrolled trials and small sample sizes. Variants of the exposure intervention (e.g., using exposure prophylactically to address anticipated claustrophobia prior to initiation of CPAP, adding relaxation techniques, or combining with other therapy techniques such as cognitive behavioural therapy or motivational enhancement) have yet to be determined whether they improve outcomes, at least for some people. Future research should include randomised controlled trials, bigger sample sizes, objective CPAP adherence metrics, and long-term effects. Efforts to formalise the diagnosis of CPAP-related claustrophobia, standardise claustrophobia tests, and analyse determinants of outcome are also needed [1-5].

References

  1. Brusasco, Claudia, Francesco Corradi, Antonia Di Domenico and Francesca Raggi, et al. "Continuous positive airway pressure in COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe respiratory failure." Eur Resp J 57(2021): 2.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Mehrtash, M, J. P. Bakkera and N. Ayas. "Predictors of continuous positive airway pressure adherence in patients with obstructive sleep apnea." Lung 197 (2019): 115-121.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Linz, Dominik, R. Doug McEvoy, Martin R. Cowie and Virend K. Somers, et al. "Associations of obstructive sleep apnea with atrial fibrillation and continuous positive airway pressure treatment: a review." JAMA Cardiol 3 (2018): 532-540.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Brusasco, Claudia, Francesco Corradi, Antonia Di Domenico and Francesca Raggi, et al. "Continuous positive airway pressure in COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe respiratory failure." Eur Resp J 57 (2021): 1.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. De Vita, N, L. Scotti, G. Cammarota and F. Racca, et al. "Predictors of intubation in COVID-19 patients treated with out-of-ICU continuous positive airway pressure." Pulmonol 28 (2022): 173-180.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward