Bridging the Gap between Statistics, Computational Mathematics and Engineering

Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics

ISSN: 2168-9679

Open Access

Editorial - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 4

Bridging the Gap between Statistics, Computational Mathematics and Engineering

Abdul Hamid Ganie*
*Correspondence: Abdul Hamid Ganie, Department of Mathematics, SSM College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India, Email:
Department of Mathematics, SSM College of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India

Received: 04-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. jacm-22-69445; Editor assigned: 06-Apr-2022, Pre QC No. P-69445; Reviewed: 12-Apr-2022, QC No. Q-69445; Revised: 18-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. R-69445; Published: 24-Apr-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/ 2168-9679.2022.11.469
Citation: Ganie, Abdul Hamid. “Bridging the Gap between Statistics, Computational Mathematics and Engineering.” J Appl Computat Math 11 (2022): 469.
Copyright: © 2022 Ganie AH. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


The primary reason for this paper is to introduce an outline of the advancement of a displaying procedure which is known as Total Least Squares (TLS) in computational science and designing, and as Errors-In Variables (EIV) demonstrating or symmetrical relapse in the factual local area. The essential ideas of TLS and EIV demonstrating are introduced. Specifically, it is shown how the apparently unique straight arithmetical methodology of TLS, as concentrated on in computational math and applied in different designing fields, is connected with EIV relapse, as concentrated on in the field of measurements. Computational techniques, as well as the fundamental logarithmic, awareness and measurable properties of the assessors, are talked about. Besides, speculations of the fundamental idea of TLS and EIV displaying, like organized TLS, Lp approximations, nonlinear and polynomial EIV, are presented and uses of the method in designing are outlined. Introduction and issue plan The Total Least Squares (TLS) strategy is one of a few direct boundary assessment procedures that has been conceived to make up for information mistakes [1].

The essential inspiration for TLS is the accompanying: Let a bunch of multi-faceted data of interest (vectors) be given. How might one get a straight mod el that makes sense of these information? The thought is to change all data of interest so that some standard of the alteration is limited subject to the imperative that the changed vectors fulfill a direct connection. Albeit the name "all out least squares" showed up in the writing just quite a while back, this technique for fitting is positively not new and has a long history in the factual writing, where the strategy is known as "symmetrical relapse", "blunders infactors relapse" or "estimation mistake demonstrating" . The uni-variate line fitting issue was at that point examined beginning around 1877. All the more as of late, the TLS way to deal with fitting has likewise animated interests outside measurements [2].

One of the primary purposes behind its prevalence is the accessibility of proficient and mathematically vigorous calculations where the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) assumes a conspicuous part. 540 Sabine Van Huffel Another explanations is the way that TLS is an application arranged system. It is appropriate for circumstances in which all information is ruined by commotion, which is quite often the situation in designing applications. In this sense, TLS and EIV demonstrating are a strong expansion of traditional least squares and common relapse, which relates just to a halfway change of the information. A thorough portrayal of the cutting edge on TLS from its origination up to the late spring of 1990 and its utilization in boundary assessment has been introduced. While the last option book is completely committed to TLS, a second and third book present the advancement in TLS and in the more extensive field of blunders in-factors displaying separately from 1990 till 1996 and from 1996 till 2001. The issue of direct boundary assessment emerges in a wide class of logical teaches like sign handling, programmed control, framework hypothesis and in everyday designing, measurements, physical science, financial matters, science, medication, and so forth . It begins from a model portrayed by a straight condition: where 6, ... ,~p and 1} indicate the factors and f3 = [f31, ... ,f3pjT E IRP assumes the part of a boundary vector that portrays the particular framework. An essential issue of applied math is to decide a gauge of the genuine however obscure boundaries from specific estimations of the factors. This leads to an over resolved set of n straight conditions (n > p) : where the ith line of information lattice X E IRnxp and vector y EIRn contain individually the estimations of the factors 6, ... ,~p and 1}. In the traditional least squares approach, as ordinarily utilized in standard relapse, the estimations X of the factors ~i are thought to be liberated from mistake and thus, all blunders are bound to the perception vectory [3].

Nonetheless, this supposition that is every now and again ridiculous: inspecting mistakes, human blunders, displaying blunders and instrument blunders might infer errors of the information lattice X too. One method for considering mistakes in X is to present annoyances likewise in X. Thusly, the accompanying TLS issue was presented in the field of computational arithmetic (R(X) signifies the scope of X and IIXIIF its Frobenius standard): Definition 1.1 (Total Least Squares issue). Given an overdetermined set of n direct conditions Xf3 >=::: y in p questions f3. The complete least squares issue looks to min] [Li E'] IIF subject to (X - Li)jj = y - E' A,E,f3 jj is known as a TLS arrangement and [Li E'] the comparing TLS remedy [4,5].

Conflict of Interest



  1. Khatun, Suparna, Kumari Shikha, Agneyo Ganguly and Nisha Pawar, et al. "Repulsive interaction induces fibril formation and their growth." Int J Biol Macromol 123 (2019): 20-25.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Hura, Greg L., Angeli L. Menon, Michal Hammel and Robert P. Rambo, et al. "Robust, high-throughput solution structural analyses by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)." Nat Methods 6 (2009): 606-612.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Bonnete, Françoise and Vivares D. "Interest of the normalized second virial coefficient and interaction potentials for crystallizing large macromolecules." Acta Crystallogr D: Biol Crystallogr 58 (2002): 1571-1575.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Abatzoglou, Theagenis J., Jerry M. Mendel and Gail A. Harada. "The constrained total least squares technique and its applications to harmonic superresolution." IEEE Trans Signal Process 39 (1991): 1070-1087.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Adcock, Robert James. "A problem in least squares." The Analyst 5 (1878): 53-54.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1282

Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics received 1282 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

arrow_upward arrow_upward