Brief Report - (2025) Volume 15, Issue 1
Received: 01-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. bda-25-169218;
Editor assigned: 03-Mar-2025, Pre QC No. P-169218;
Reviewed: 17-Mar-2025, QC No. Q-169218;
Revised: 22-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. R-169218;
Published:
31-Mar-2025
, DOI: 10.37421/2090-5025.2025.15.286
Citation: Middleton, Freya. "Bioceramic-based Materials for Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review." Bioceram Dev Appl 15 (2025): 286.
Copyright: © 2025 Middleton F. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Bioceramic materials used in dental restorations can be broadly classified into bioinert (e.g., zirconia and alumina) and bioactive (e.g., calcium silicate-based cements) categories. Bioinert ceramics like zirconia exhibit high fracture toughness, aesthetic appeal due to tooth-like translucency and excellent wear resistance, making them suitable for crowns, bridges and implant abutments. In contrast, bioactive ceramics such as Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and newer calcium silicate cements actively interact with dental tissues to stimulate healing and promote mineralization. These materials are increasingly used in endodontics for root repair, perforation sealing and apexification due to their ability to form hydroxyapatite in vivo and maintain a seal against microbial leakage.
One of the most significant advantages of bioceramic dental materials is their ability to support biological integration while maintaining a stable interface with dental tissues. For example, calcium silicate-based sealers are not only radiopaque and hydrophilic but also exhibit superior sealing ability and promote periapical healing by releasing calcium ions that encourage dentin bridge formation. Zirconia restorations, known for their durability and corrosion resistance, are also compatible with oral soft tissues, resulting in minimal inflammation or allergic reactions. Furthermore, their aesthetic qualities make them a preferred choice for anterior restorations where appearance is a key concern. With advances in CAD/CAM technologies, these materials can now be fabricated with high precision, improving clinical efficiency and patient satisfaction.
Despite their numerous advantages, bioceramic materials face certain limitations that impact their widespread adoption. The brittleness of some ceramic types under high occlusal loads, challenges in bonding with composite resins and longer setting times of specific endodontic formulations like MTA can limit their clinical use. To address these challenges, ongoing research focuses on enhancing mechanical properties through nanoparticle reinforcement, hybrid material development and incorporation of radiopacifiers that do not compromise biocompatibility. Moreover, emerging formulations such as premixed injectable bioceramic sealers and translucent zirconia are improving handling properties and esthetic outcomes, reflecting a trend toward more user-friendly and patient-centered solutions [2].
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Bioceramics Development and Applications received 1050 citations as per Google Scholar report