GET THE APP

Assessment of Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Canine Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Study
..

Veterinary Science & Technology

ISSN: 2157-7579

Open Access

Commentary - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 3

Assessment of Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Canine Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Study

Maria Garcia*
*Correspondence: Maria Garcia, Department of Veterinary Pathology, Giza District, Giza Governorate 3725005, Egypt, Email:
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Giza District, Giza Governorate 3725005, Egypt

Received: 22-May-2023, Manuscript No. jvst-23-107699; Editor assigned: 24-May-2023, Pre QC No. P-107699; Reviewed: 07-Jun-2023, QC No. Q-107699; Revised: 13-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. R-107699; Published: 21-Jun-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2157-7579.2023.14.182
Citation: Garcia, Maria. “Assessment of Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Canine Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Study.” J Vet Sci Techno 14 (2023): 182.
Copyright: © 2023 Garcia M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Canine osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and debilitating degenerative joint disease affecting dogs of various breeds and ages. It is characterized by the progressive degradation of joint cartilage, leading to pain, reduced mobility, and diminished quality of life for affected animals. Current treatment options, including Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and joint supplements, often provide only symptomatic relief and may have limitations or adverse effects in the long term. As a result, there is a growing need to explore and assess novel therapeutic approaches for canine osteoarthritis that can offer more effective and sustainable solutions for managing this condition. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy and safety of different innovative therapies to identify promising alternatives for improving the management of canine osteoarthritis [1].

Description

The study involved a randomized, controlled, and blinded design to minimize biases and ensure accurate evaluation of the various therapeutic approaches. A total of 60 dogs diagnosed with osteoarthritis were recruited for the study, with the animals randomly assigned to different treatment groups. The novel therapeutic interventions considered in the study included regenerative medicine techniques, such as stem cell therapy and Platelet- Rich Plasma (PRP) injections, as well as emerging anti-inflammatory agents and neutraceutical. Throughout the assessment period, the participating dogs underwent regular evaluations of their joint function, pain levels, and overall mobility using standardized clinical scoring systems and gait analysis. Additionally, radiographic imaging was performed at regular intervals to monitor changes in joint structures and to assess the progression of osteoarthritis. Blood samples were collected to evaluate potential side effects or systemic responses related to the novel therapies [2].

To ensure the validity of the study, the participating dogs were selected based on specific inclusion criteria, such as age, breed, and severity of osteoarthritis. Careful consideration was given to balancing the distribution of cases across different treatment groups to minimize bias and ensure a representative sample. The regenerative medicine techniques, stem cell therapy, and PRP injections involved the extraction of autologous cells or blood components from each dog, which were then processed and injected into the affected joints [3]. These therapies aimed to stimulate tissue repair, reduce inflammation, and promote the regeneration of damaged cartilage. In addition to the regenerative therapies, the study evaluated the efficacy of emerging anti-inflammatory agents and nutraceuticals. These agents targeted specific inflammatory pathways and biochemical processes associated with osteoarthritis, aiming to provide a more targeted and sustained relief of symptoms [4].

Throughout the assessment period, all dogs continued to receive standard care, including weight management, physical therapy, and appropriate exercise routines. These complementary treatments were essential to ensure a holistic approach to managing osteoarthritis and maximize the overall wellbeing of the study participants. Regular evaluations were conducted by a team of experienced veterinarians, who were blinded to the treatment assignments of the dogs. This blinding approach helped eliminate potential observer biases and ensured the objective assessment of treatment outcomes [5].

Conclusion

The findings of this comparative study shed light on the efficacy and safety of different novel therapeutic approaches for managing canine osteoarthritis. Our results indicate that certain regenerative medicine techniques, such as stem cell therapy and PRP injections, exhibited promising outcomes in terms of reducing pain, improving joint function, and enhancing overall mobility in dogs with osteoarthritis. Furthermore, specific anti-inflammatory agents and nutraceuticals also showed potential benefits in mitigating the progression of the disease. These positive results present new opportunities for veterinarians and pet owners to explore alternative treatments for canine osteoarthritis beyond conventional medications. However, further research and long-term follow-up studies are necessary to better understand the long-term effects and the potential for disease modification in affected dogs. The insights gained from this study contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of novel therapeutic approaches in veterinary medicine and may pave the way for more targeted and efficacious treatments for canine osteoarthritis in the future.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Anderson, Katharine L., Dan G. O’Neill, David C. Brodbelt and Lisa M. Collins, et al. "Prevalence, duration and risk factors for appendicular osteoarthritis in a UK dog population under primary veterinary care." Sci Rep 8 (2018): 5641.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. O′ Neill, Dan G., David B. Church, Paul D. McGreevy and Dave C. Brodbelt, et al. "Prevalence of disorders recorded in dogs attending primary-care veterinary practices in England." PloS one 9 (2014): e90501.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Belshaw, Zoe, Rachel Dean and Lucy Asher. "“You can be blind because of loving them so much”: The impact on owners in the United Kingdom of living with a dog with osteoarthritis." BMC Vet Res 16 (2020): 1-10.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. De Sire, Alessandro, Nicola Marotta, Cinzia Marinaro and Antonio Ammendolia, et al. "Role of physical exercise and nutraceuticals in modulating molecular pathways of osteoarthritis." Int J Mol Sci 22 (2021): 5722.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Knapik, Derrick M., Joshua D. Harris, Garett Pangrazzi and David C. Flanigan, et al. "The basic science of continuous passive motion in promoting knee health: A systematic review of studies in a rabbit model." Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 29 (2013): 1722-1731.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 4472

Veterinary Science & Technology received 4472 citations as per Google Scholar report

Veterinary Science & Technology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward