GET THE APP

Architectural Design and Climate Change
..

Fluid Mechanics: Open Access

ISSN: 2476-2296

Open Access

Short Communication - (2022) Volume 9, Issue 1

Architectural Design and Climate Change

Tsuyoshi Setokawa*
*Correspondence: Tsuyoshi Setokawa, Department of Health Sciences, Health and Education Centre, Campania, Italy, Email:
Department of Health Sciences, Health and Education Centre, Campania, Italy

Received: 04-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. fmoa-22-64857; Editor assigned: 05-Jan-2022, Pre QC No. P-64857; Reviewed: 13-Jan-2022, QC No. Q-64857; Revised: 18-Jan-2022, Manuscript No. R-64857; Published: 25-Jan-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2476-2296.2022.9.211
Citation: Setokawa, Tsuyoshi. “Architectural Design and Climate Change.” Fluid Mech Open Acc 9 (2022): 211.
Copyright: © 2022 Setokawa T. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Climate changes that will affect the built environment are numerous, and different researchers have looked into them. Impacts will also vary substantially based on the existing built environment's quality and density, as well as what specific local climate changes may occur. Climate change and its consequences. Both direct and indirect effects on the built environment exist. Direct impacts will alter the physical fabric of the environment constructed environment Indirect effects will have an impact on the built environment's economic, social, and environmental surroundings. The constructed environment will be affected by the environment in which it works [1].

Description

Human settlement design is an important aspect in managing carbon emissions, finite resource availability, ecological degradation, and climate change. Architectural education plays a critical role in promoting the principles and techniques that address these concerns. To generate graduates with holistic skills, including environmental knowledge relevant to sustainable design, new pedagogic paradigms are necessary. Although the successful integration of technical principles within creative design still confronts a number of pedagogic challenges, these competences are scheduled to become an obligatory part of professional architecture education in the UK [2].

The tiny sample size, for starters, limits the capacity to generalise the findings. A larger number of respondents should be included in future studies to gauge tool enjoyment. Second, it would be fascinating to measure the designers' interest in DSTs with better precision. Students in the design studio, unlike practitioners, were compelled to use specific tools to meet the design studio's educational goals, which could have led to a skewed impression of and usage of these technologies. Similar to professional activity, the academic framework of the study has its own restrictions (due dates, evaluation standards, DST learning curve versus semester duration, etc.) [3].

Several instances of biomimicry that focuses on reducing GHG emissions can be classified into three groups. The first strategy is to replicate the efficiency with which live organisms and systems transform materials and energy in ways that are less resource intensive than what humans do. The motivation is that being more energy efficient means burning less fossil fuel and emitting fewer greenhouse gases emitted into the environment. The second strategy is to develop new energy production methods to reduce human reliance on fossil fuels. As a result, extra GHGs will not be released. The third approach is to look to the living world for examples of how creatures or processes within them can function carbon sequestration and storage it is possible to imitate this [4,5].

Conclusion

Summer temperatures that are rising as a result of climate change are a source of concern for mid-latitude cities since they exacerbate the UHI phenomena and diminish building interior thermal comfort. Architects and urban designers are critical players in the implementation of specific climate change adaption strategies. Their actions, whether made at the city or building scale, can help reduce the UHI effect or boost a building's passive cooling capability. Adaptation measures' success, however, is contingent on professionals' knowledge and abilities. The scientific literature on climate change adaptation is extensive and recent, but it is challenging to apply it to architectural and urban design practise. We reasoned that a DST focused on this topic would aid in knowledge improvement.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Lee, Sunghee and Youngchul Kim. "A framework of biophilic urbanism for improving climate change adaptability in urban environments." Urban Forestry Urban Greening 61 (2021): 127104.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Li, Liying. "Integrating climate change impact in new building design process: A review of building life cycle carbon emission assessment methodologies." Cleaner Eng Technol 5 (2021): 100286.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Pajek, Luka and Mitja Kosir. "Exploring climate-change impacts on energy efficiency and overheating vulnerability of bioclimatic residential buildings under central European climate." Sustainability 13 (2021): 6791.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Zou, Yukai, Siwei Lou, Dawei Xia and Isaac YF Lun, et al. "Multi-objective building design optimization considering the effects of long-term climate change." J Building Eng 44 (2021): 102904.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Fakriah, N and M.H.A. Edytia. "Sustainability concept as climate change adaptation in the vernacular house in Aceh." In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environ Sci, IOP Publishing, 2021.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

arrow_upward arrow_upward