Lorin M Benneker, Carolin Roenn, Emin Aghayev, Franziska V Schoeni-Affolter, Aristomenis Exadaktylos, Suzanne E Anderson, Matthias Sturzenegger, Andre Busato and Paul F Heini
Objective: For the management of whiplash-associated disorders the use of patient oriented disability questionnaires are of uppermost importance. The Australian whiplash disability questionnaire has a high content, face and constructs validity, and an excellent short- and medium-term reproducibility. However, until now no German version of this questionnaire is available.
Aim: A cross-cultural adaptation of the whiplash disability questionnaire for a German-speaking population with ensured retention of psychometric properties such as validity and reliability of the translated version.
Settings: Acute and chronic settings.
Subject: A total of 75 patients (67 acute/8 chronic) and a control group of 177 asymptomatic volunteers were analyzed.
Interventions: All participants completed the translated 13-item questionnaire as well as documented their current health state on a visual analog scale (VAShealth) and a general disability questionnaire (EQ-5D) for comparison. For test-retest reliability assessment 16 chronic patients and 25 healthy persons completed the questionnaire twice with an interval of 2 weeks.
Main measures: Construct and concurrent validity and test-retest reliability.
Results : The translated version showed no floor or ceiling effects, a high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.95) and a very good inter-item correlation (rho=0.926). The concurrent validity testing using EQ-5D score as the reference showed a significant correlation to the whiplash disability questionnaire (overall rho=0.838, acute patients rho=0.749, chronic patients rho=0.876; p<0.001 each) and to the VAShealth (overall rho=-0.74, acute patients rho=-0.66, chronic patients rho=-0.65; p<0.001 each). The intra-class coefficient (0.969) indicated high short term reproducibility.
Discussion : The German version of the whiplash disability questionnaire is valid and reliable as outcome measure for acute and chronic study settings.PDF
Share this article
Journal of Spine received 1579 citations as per Google Scholar report