A Mass Extinction on Mars? Evolution, Oceans, Obliquity,
Colliding Worlds and the Magnetic Field Magnetosphere

Rhawn Joseph1; David Duvall2; Rudolph Schild3

doi:10.37421/2329-9002.2023.11.257

Review Article - (2023) Volume 11, Issue 1

A Mass Extinction on Mars? Evolution, Oceans, Obliquity, Colliding Worlds and the Magnetic Field Magnetosphere

Rhawn Joseph¹^*, David Duvall² and Rudolph Schild³

^*Correspondence: Rhawn Joseph, Astrobiology Research Center, California, USA, Email: ,

Author information

¹Astrobiology Research Center, California, USA
²Department of Zoology, Oklahoma State University, OK, USA
³Center for Astrophysics, Harvard-Smithsonian, Cambridge, MA, USA

Received: 31-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. JPGEB-23-89235; Editor assigned: 02-Jan-2023, Pre QC No. P-89235; Reviewed: 12-Jan-2023, QC No. Q-89235; Revised: 16-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. R-89235; Published: 23-Jan-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2329-9002.2023.11.257
Citation: Joseph, Rhawn, David Duvall and Rudolph Schild. “A Mass Extinction on Mars? Evolution, Oceans, Obliquity, Colliding Worlds and the Magnetic Field Magnetosphere.” J Phylogenetics Evol Biol 11 (2023): 257.
Copyright: © 2023 Joseph R, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Retraction Note

The article entitled “A Mass Extinction on Mars? Evolution, Oceans, Obliquity, Colliding Worlds and the Magnetic Field Magnetosphere” has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Phylogenetics & Evolutionary Biology, considering the statements provided in the article as personal opinion of the author which was found not having any conflict or biasness towards anything. As the article was a perspective one, information provided by the author was considered as an opinion to be expressed through publication.

Soon after the publication of the paper, we witnessed some serious concerns and many of them argued that the paper is a personal perspective and had not discussed any relevant ethical issue considered under the journal scope. Moreover, the paper is neither innovative nor thought provoking.

Publisher took decision to make the article online solely based on the reviewers suggestion which considered the article not but a personal opinion of the author. However, it is found that the article has some unavoidable mistakes and issues, therefore, being retracted from the journal.