Luis M Tumialán, Mark A Mahan, Frederick F. Marciano and Nicholas Theodore
Study background: The application of MIS techniques to address complications of previous midline surgery has not been fully explored.
Methods: Three patients with previous midline lumbar surgery underwent revision surgery with minimally invasive approaches for management of either: infection, recurrent radiculopathyor symptomatic heterotopic bone formation.
Results: Patient 1 was found to have a persistent discitis 10 months after a lumbar fusion that was complicated by a pseudoarthrosis and infection requiring a second surgery for additional stabilization and third surgery for an incision and drainage. To avoid reopening the incision for a fourth time, a minimally invasive retractor was used to access the disc space and remove the interbody spacer. Patient 2 experienced a recurrent radiculopathy three months after an L5-S1 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. CT scan demonstrated heterotopic bone formation into the S1 neural foramen. A minimally invasive retractor was used through a paramedian incision to explant the pedicle screw rod construct on the symptomatic side, remove the heterotopic bone formation and decompress the neural foramen. Patient 3 experienced onset of an S1 radiculopathy 11 years after an L4 to S1 fusion. A fixed tubular minimally invasive retractor was used to access the S1 neural foramen and decompress the symptomatic root.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive spinal surgical techniques have the capacity to adequately address focal complications that have occurred with midline surgery. These techniques preclude the need to reopen a previous incision, which is especially valuable in those patients with delayed healing capacity, extensive previous surgery or previous infection.
PDFShare this article
Journal of Spine received 2022 citations as per Google Scholar report
